Based on the presented quotes, one can conclude that nature existed first—the unconscious elemental forces and instincts that precede the emergence of moral categories.

Nature’s Primacy and the Objectivity of Ethics

Based on the presented quotes, one can conclude that nature existed first—the unconscious elemental forces and instincts that precede the emergence of moral categories. For example, one excerpt states:

"Elementality, passion, natural force are Ungrund, are freedom prior to consciousness, to reason, to good and truth, to evaluation and choice. Good and evil come later..." (source: link txt)

This assertion means that natural force and instinctive beginnings exist as a basic reality before the conscious division into good and evil emerges, which only occurs with the development of consciousness and reflection.

Regarding the objectivity of the concepts of good and evil, the quotes indicate that ethical evaluation implies realism—that is, good is not merely a subjective judgment that can be reduced to an arbitrary idea or social norm. As stated in the following excerpt:

"Ethical evaluation inevitably implies ethical realism, it implies that good exists, and is not created solely by my thought. And under no circumstances can good be substituted by society..." (source: link txt)

This indicates that the concepts of good and evil are objective, possessing an independence from purely subjective human experience or social constructs.

Thus, according to the presented materials, nature (as a manifestation of elemental life forces and instincts) appears before morality, while morality and the concepts of good and evil develop later based on the emergence of consciousness. Moreover, the objectivity of these categories is implied as something that exists independently of individual or collective judgment, forming the basis of ethical realism.