Based on the presented materials, several key factors can be identified that explain the difference in attitudes towards spiritual practices and everyday life between early believers and modern representatives of religious communities.

Divided Paths: Spiritual Unity and Modern Complexity

Based on the presented materials, several key factors can be identified that explain the difference in attitudes towards spiritual practices and everyday life between early believers and modern representatives of religious communities.

On one hand, early believers placed primary importance on spiritual factors that served as the foundation of their identity and holistic worldview. For example, in the reconstruction of the "Slavic tradition," it is emphasized that for early Slavic philologists, religion played the role of a determining core:
"But early Slavicism, in many aspects justifiably compared to European Romanticism, gives unconditional precedence to spiritual factors – with religion, of course, occupying the foremost position. The definition of Slavism in its spiritual nature is provided by Orthodoxy." (source: link txt)

Thus, primary attention was devoted to spiritual values, a shared spiritual consciousness, and religious doctrine, which contributed to the formation of spiritual practice as a fundamental element of community life. This approach reflected a more holistic and emotionally rich perception of the world, with religious consciousness holding a central place.

On the other hand, the modern context shows a shift towards the influence of material and sociocultural factors. Various transformations tied to historical processes, geopolitical changes, and an increased awareness of the world have led to religious identity being increasingly reconstructed on the basis of additional structural and material realities. Modern members of religious communities tend to view spiritual practices in the context of a complex interaction with sociocultural, political, and historical conditions, which results in a more fragmented and pragmatic attitude towards spirituality. As noted in one text, this state reflects an abundance of "post-mortal" experiences and an overall weakening of stable religious orientations (source: link txt).

Thus, the main difference is that early believers built their lives on a singular, deep spiritual experience where religion was the central element of both community and personal identity, whereas modern religious communities face multiple centers of influence – historical, material, and socio-political – which alter the character and significance of spiritual practices in their lives.