Interpreting the expression "war in the name of Christ" through the prism of a provocative comparison with psychopathy and narcissism, one can see that it is not so much about the traditional understanding of a sacred conflict as it is about reflecting personal anomalies that allow a person to perceive their own violence or aggressive actions as a mission of supreme importance.

Sacred Conflicts: Psychopathy and Narcissism in the Name of Christ

Interpreting the expression "war in the name of Christ" through the prism of a provocative comparison with psychopathy and narcissism, one can see that it is not so much about the traditional understanding of a sacred conflict as it is about reflecting personal anomalies that allow a person to perceive their own violence or aggressive actions as a mission of supreme importance. In other words, such behavior can be seen as an expression of two psychological extremes.

On one hand, the phenomenon under consideration can be compared to psychopathy—a condition characterized by a distorted, disharmonious organization of the psyche, where a person tends toward total changes in their entire psychic makeup and social maladaptation. For example, one source states:

"Psychopathy is a personality anomaly characterized by the disharmonious mental structuring of the individual. The criteria for psychopathy are: 1) the prominence of mental disorders that lead a person to social maladaptation; 2) total changes in the entire psychic appearance of a person; 3) relative stability of psychological features (P.B. Gannushkin). A distinction is made between constitutional psychopathy, which arises as a result of various diseases, brain injuries, infections, etc., and acquired psychopathy. Alas, our reality often acts as a 'supplier' of psychopathic personalities."
(source: link txt)

This emphasizes that the deformation of the psychic state can lead to actions rooted in an internal anomaly and an inability to adhere to moral and ethical norms—traits that can also be seen in those who justify violence with the slogan of a higher mission, viewing their cruelty as predetermined and inevitable.

On the other hand, the concept of "war in the name of Christ" may reflect traits of narcissism, where a personality is excessively focused on itself, believing that its egocentrism corresponds to the highest manifestation of love and righteousness. Such a worldview makes it easy to justify any actions in favor of personal ambitions, ignoring responsibility toward others. In support of this, the following definition is provided:

"Narcissism—the orientation of love towards oneself. A conviction that this egocentrism coincides with the 'love' that all others somehow lack, that it is inexplicably and genuinely the true 'religion'. A denial, paired with almost complete ignorance of tradition, culture, continuity, belonging, responsibility, etc. An a priori denial based on contempt. A complete unwillingness even to try to understand what is being denied… A denial rooted in the subconscious knowledge that 'recognition' would limit 'freedom', i.e., narcissism. Self-admiration and, in this regard, the selection of pseudo-absolutes: vegetarianism, the denial of diplomas, the very idea of working for a living, 'moralizing' toward all who do not recognize these pseudo-absolutes."
(source: link txt)

Thus, when the concept of "war in the name of Christ" is examined through a provocative comparison with psychopathy and narcissism, it acquires additional nuances: it is not merely a holy war but rather an expression of deeply ingrained personality distortions. On one hand, cruelty and violence may be dictated by a psychopathic disturbance, leading to ruthless actions devoid of emotional warmth and compassion. On the other hand, the conviction of one's own uniqueness, characteristic of narcissism, leads one to view oneself as a bearer of a higher mission, justifying any actions as manifestations of a great destiny and the inevitable righteousness of one’s position.

Such psychological distortion creates fertile ground for the self-justification of extreme methods and violence, where a religious slogan becomes a cover for personal pathological traits. This comparatively provocative comparison emphasizes that behind the apparent nobility and spirituality, there may lie a distorted perception of oneself and the surrounding world, where moral and ethical concerns are relegated to the background in favor of aggressive self-realization.

Supporting citation(s):
"Psychopathy is a personality anomaly characterized by the disharmonious arrangement of the individual's psyche. The criteria for psychopathy are: 1) the prominence of mental disorders that lead a person to social maladaptation; 2) total changes in the entire psychic appearance of a person; 3) relative stability of psychological features (P.B. Gannushkin). A distinction is made between constitutional psychopathy, which arises as a result of various diseases, brain injuries, infections, etc., and acquired psychopathy. Alas, our reality often acts as a 'supplier' of psychopathic personalities." (source: link txt)

"Narcissism—the orientation of love towards oneself. A conviction that this egocentrism coincides with the 'love' that all others are somehow deprived of, that it is inexplicably and genuinely the true 'religion'. A denial, with almost complete ignorance of tradition, culture, continuity, belonging, responsibility, etc. An a priori denial based on contempt. A complete unwillingness even to try to understand what is being denied… A denial rooted in the subconscious knowledge that 'recognition' would limit 'freedom', i.e., narcissism. Self-admiration and, in this respect, the selection of pseudo-absolutes: vegetarianism, denial of diplomas, the very idea of working for money, 'moralizing' toward those who do not recognize these pseudo-absolutes." (source: link txt)