The division of power in democratic systems often gives rise to tension, as each branch—legislative, executive, and judicial—is inherently designed to perform specific functions, and their interactions are far from devoid of conflicts.

Fragmented Authority: The Seeds of Democratic Discord

The division of power in democratic systems often gives rise to tension, as each branch—legislative, executive, and judicial—is inherently designed to perform specific functions, and their interactions are far from devoid of conflicts. For instance, the source " link txt" emphasizes that the very separation of powers contains "the genetically embedded seeds of conflicts and quarrels," meaning that even if each branch claims to serve the common good, their autonomy and independent control mechanisms can create conditions for mutual confrontation. The absence of a single centralized control leads to a distribution of powers in such a way that each branch may strive to strengthen its position through compromise and bribery, often resulting in corrupt schemes.

Furthermore, as noted in " link txt," democratic power, based on the principle of equality, has a tendency to fragment society. At its core, the equality and freedom of all society members creates a situation where, instead of uniting to address common issues, separate interests form, ultimately undermining the unity of governance and fostering political conflicts. This fragmentation simplifies manipulation, allowing parties to exploit system weaknesses for personal or group gain, which further intensifies corrupt practices.

Thus, when power institutions are not united by a single system of accountability and control, the separation of powers becomes a vulnerable arena for political disagreements and corrupt practices, hindering the achievement of their overarching goal—serving the common good of society.

Supporting citation(s):
"All power comes from God, and therefore—as long as state management is not perceived as a religious service, as a 'Divine burden'—do not expect good. A 'symphony of powers', that is, their harmonious combination, will not materialize. Especially, the current fashionable nonsense considers the theory of 'separation of powers' into executive, legislative, and judicial branches as the ultimate ideal, despite the complete absence of centralized control. Separation cannot bear a benevolent spirit; it carries 'genetically' embedded seeds of conflicts and quarrels. Another matter is that unity will not bring good if it is artificial, mechanical, and external." (source: link txt)

"In organizing social forms of life, democratic power cannot ensure the spiritual unity of society as it once did in the sacred era. Democratic power does not unite but divides, for its foundation is equality. The law enforces the principle of separation and differentiation, ensuring individual independence, equality before the law, freedom, and solitude. By achieving equality and freedom in democracy, we lose unity." (source: link txt)