According to the cited materials, Jesus deliberately avoided attempts to refute the charges of blasphemy, since these accusations were based on the fact that He forgave sins and called God His Father—a gesture perceived as claiming an exclusive authority of God and offending the religious sentiments of orthodox Jews.

Embracing Suffering: Jesus’s Silent Acceptance

According to the cited materials, Jesus deliberately avoided attempts to refute the charges of blasphemy, since these accusations were based on the fact that He forgave sins and called God His Father—a gesture perceived as claiming an exclusive authority of God and offending the religious sentiments of orthodox Jews. In one passage it is stated:

"In another part of the Gospels, the charge of blasphemy is connected with the idea that Jesus offended the religious feelings of orthodox Jews: firstly, He forgave sins, meaning He was claiming the authority of God; secondly, He 'called God His Father' (in a sense different from the commonly accepted 'Father of all Israelites')..." (source: link txt).

That is, had Jesus actively objected to such allegations, He would have risked emphasizing even further the controversial nature of His claims, thereby giving His opponents reason to assert that He was indeed championing ideas contrary to religious traditions. His refusal to elaborate or defend His position could also be seen as a deep trust in His Father and an acknowledgement of the inevitability of participating in the plan He was carrying out on earth.

On the other hand, the fact that God did not spare Him from these accusations holds special significance. It indicates that Jesus's mission was meant to include trials and suffering—even if these trials took the form of blasphemy charges, which, according to Jewish Law, were the most serious of crimes. The text notes:

"The rest of the charges were also not substantiated. Nevertheless, Jesus was given the opportunity to respond to them. He refused..." (source: link txt).

Thus, His refusal to answer the accusations demonstrates that Jesus did not seek self-justification or an escape from responsibility, but instead accepted the suffering that was an intrinsic part of His mission and divine purpose. The fact that God did not absolve Him from these accusations emphasizes the inevitability of His destiny and illustrates that the true strength of His mission lay not in being spared from difficulties, but in His steadfast adherence to the divine plan—a plan that required the acceptance of suffering as a means to achieve a higher purpose.