According to the presented materials, the distinction between the subjective and the objective in the context of human cognition is based on the difference between internal, personal experience and the "common," extra-corporeal level of reality.

Bridging Inner and Outer Realms: The Dual Nature of Human Experience

According to the presented materials, the distinction between the subjective and the objective in the context of human cognition is based on the difference between internal, personal experience and the "common," extra-corporeal level of reality.

By the term subjective, we understand not only immediate personal experience but also what the author calls transsubjective inner-corporeal. This means that a personality is formed through a "conglomerate of experiences" that unites both inner life and the aspect of bodily existence. In this way, individuality is seen as an integrated unity of spirit and body. As noted in one of the sources:

"Thus, the following differentiation of concepts arises; by the subjective, of course, we mean not only the subjective in our sense of the word, but also the transsubjective inner-corporeal: we shall call such a conglomerate of experiences spiritual-corporeal individuality, - and by the objective, of course, we mean only the transsubjective extra-corporeal." (source: link txt)

On the other hand, the objective is understood exclusively as the transsubjective extra-corporeal, meaning it relates to those aspects of knowable reality that exist outside immediate personal experience and are acquired through publicly accessible, collective knowledge. This division emphasizes that in cognition, a crucial role is played not simply by external reality, but by the manner in which an individual knower interacts with this external world.

Further exploration of this problem reveals that the knower transcends the limitations of narrow personal perception, moving into a form of "transcendence." As stated in another excerpt:

"The knower must step out of their seclusion not into the objective, but into the transobjective. This is not objectification, but transcendence. Whereas objectification is an outward movement, the transsubjective may denote a movement inward and a dwelling within everything, the whole, the universe. The creative subject symbolically expresses itself in the object and the objective, but it can actually express itself in the transsubjective." (source: link txt)

Thus, the distinction between the subjective and the objective here is understood through the dual nature of human experience:

• The subjective includes an internal, "integrated" experience that reflects both personal consciousness and corporeality, forming individuality.
• The objective, on the other hand, represents that part of reality conditioned by common, externally observable characteristics which goes beyond individual experience.

This concept allows a deeper appreciation of how personal consciousness is capable of penetrating the flow of a broader existence while maintaining its uniqueness and simultaneously being part of the whole.