The topic of God remains relevant even among atheists, as it addresses fundamental questions about the essence of humanity, one’s worldview, and the societal foundations that are common to both sides of the dialogue.

Faith, Science, and the Human Question

The topic of God remains relevant even among atheists, as it addresses fundamental questions about the essence of humanity, one’s worldview, and the societal foundations that are common to both sides of the dialogue. The interaction between intellectual stances that advocate for science and materialism and those that uphold religious views gives rise to discussions about what makes a human being human and the role that faith plays in this equation. One source notes that the question of man—his role and destiny—remains central in the dialogue between materialism and faith, as both camps see man as the key meeting point of worldviews:
"Man. Theoretically, it is man who stands at the center of the worldview or concern of both materialism and the Christian worldview. The type of man is the subject of the dialogue... Unfortunately, a true dialogue does not exist; however, there are atheists who desire a dialogue, who are not merely willing to compromise but who approach it with some degree of sympathy or interest." (source: link txt)

Regarding the scientific arguments used to point out the misconceptions of believers, several key aspects are raised.

For instance, the intelligentsia often relies on an argument that reduces the question of God’s existence to an empirically "unverified fact," referring to it as a "medical fact":"How does the intelligentsia protect itself from belief in God?

Its arguments are surprisingly similar to the 'brilliant' proofs provided by Ostap Bender in his 'historical' dispute with the churchmen. These arguments can be divided into: — scientific; — historical; — psychological. The 'scientific' arguments were crystallized by Ostap Bender in these words: 'There is no God!.. There is none, no, and there never was. It’s a medical fact...'" (source: link txt)

Furthermore, some argue that the atheistic position stems from disbelief in miracles, while the proponents themselves distinguish between the miracles inherent in their worldview and those described in religious texts. They claim that miracles, confirmed by observations and testimonies, contradict arbitrary hypotheses about the origin of life, thereby revealing inconsistencies in religious claims:
"Many of those who proudly point to science to prove the impossibility of miracles actually believe in miracles themselves—miracles that are twenty times less credible than the biblical miracles attested by many respectable people..." (source: link txt)

Thus, even despite atheists’ lack of belief in God, the topic remains significant as it forms the basis of an ongoing dialogue between different systems of thought. In this dialogue, scientific arguments are used to criticize religious beliefs, often by equating matters of faith with empirically unverified facts and by highlighting contradictions in the evaluation of miracles.