Breadcrumbs Breadcrumbs

The path to freedom through truth







Embracing the Power of Now


In the hustle and bustle of everyday life, the most important truth often slips away: even the briefest moment of awareness can turn our entire life upside down. Imagine that you stop living by a predetermined script and allow yourself to pause to ask an important question – what would you like to do right now? This approach helps break the chains of automatism and routine, opening a world of new possibilities and solutions before you.

Start small – devote a few minutes to feeling your freedom once again. Perhaps you don’t need a grand plan for the future; it’s enough to simply decide what to do in the next minute or five. It might be a jog, a light conversation, or, on the contrary, some well-deserved rest. Each such choice demonstrates your readiness to take control of your life and live consciously, bravely stepping from the old into the new.

These moments of awareness not only shatter the shackles of everyday monotony but also inspire radical changes. Treat yourself to the possibility of starting every day anew, filling it with determination and creativity. For it is in these small choices that the great art of changing your life lies, opening new horizons and bold prospects.

What simple act can radically change a person’s life?

One of the simplest actions capable of radically changing a person’s life is to give yourself the opportunity to take a break, to stop and ask yourself, "What do I want to do right now?" If a person views his or her life as a new opportunity, they can begin to act consciously—even if that decision is made just for the next few minutes. This act symbolizes a rejection of automatism and routine, opening the door to new paths and solutions.

As noted in one source:
"Imagine that for many years you lived among convicts... Now look at your life as that of a free person, and start repeatedly asking yourself: I am free to act as I want; what do I want to do right now – in the next five minutes? Go for a run? Talk? Lie down and rest?" (source: 1346_6725.txt).

In addition, another source emphasizes that even one minute can be enough to take an important step towards change:
"And don’t tell me that there isn’t enough time for the upcoming meeting. Not only in five days but even in one minute you can change your entire life. ..." (source: 1483_7410.txt).

Thus, a simple conscious decision to pay attention to what you truly want to do here and now—whether it is a bit of physical activity, a conversation, rest, or some other choice—can initiate deep changes in life. This action allows a person to break free from routine and discover new opportunities that may lead to a radical change in their path.













Focus on Duty: The Practical Drake


In a world where emotions often take center stage, sometimes practicality and decisiveness come to the forefront. This is exactly the case with our drake, whose actions demonstrate confidence in carrying out his duties. Contrary to the usual expectations of close emotional attachments, the behavior of this character clearly shows that the main goal is to complete assigned tasks and stay focused on the matter at hand. Possessing a distinctly businesslike demeanor, the drake sets personal feelings aside and strictly adheres to his professional principles, underscoring his determination and practicality in any situation. This approach—where emotions give way to rational calculation—serves as a reminder that achieving goals often requires a clear and rational perspective on the world. Ultimately, this observation leads to the conclusion that even in a realm where attachment might otherwise take a central role, final success often depends on the ability to focus on what truly matters and to achieve results, regardless of superficial emotional factors.

How can the behavior of a drake who does not drift away from the duck, despite the apparent absence of emotional attachments, be interpreted?

The drake’s behavior can be seen not as a result of emotional attachment, but as a manifestation of practicality and a businesslike attitude. In other words, even if a warm emotional connection is not outwardly evident, the drake acts with the understanding of the importance of the task at hand. For example, one excerpt states:

"Let him say whatever he wants, pay no attention!" whispered the Portuguese bird to the duck. "But he is a very businesslike drake, and after all, business is what matters!.. Well, now I'm going to lie down and rest."

This quote (source: 666_3325.txt) clearly demonstrates that the drake's behavior is characterized by a focus on fulfilling his responsibilities, where emotional attachment gives way to a practical approach.

Thus, one can conclude that his reluctance to drift away from the duck reflects his commitment to executing an important function or duty, rather than stemming from emotional involvement. It suggests that in his world, priority is given to a practical, businesslike perspective over the expression of warm feelings.

Supporting citation(s):
"Let him say whatever he wants, pay no attention!" whispered the Portuguese bird to the duck. "But he is a very businesslike drake, and after all, business is what matters!.. Well, now I'm going to lie down and rest." (source: 666_3325.txt)













Embracing Life's True Value


Life, in essence, is a unique gift that demands our mindfulness and respect. Many sources remind us that life is a priceless gift given from above, and to squander it on fleeting pleasures or harmful habits is to neglect a great blessing. Modern society often seduces us in the pursuit of personal comfort and material success, yet this chase for selfish goals leads to the loss of the true meaning of existence.

By focusing solely on ourselves, many people forget that life is not meant for the satisfaction of superficial desires but for aspiring to something higher and wiser. When our actions are driven only by personal convenience, we risk missing the depth and significance of every day. This is where the ambiguity of our being lies: a narrow interpretation of success often fails to bring satisfaction if the heart lacks faith in grander purposes and spiritual development.

In conclusion, the true value of life is revealed through the ability to look beyond one's own interests, striving for harmony within oneself and with the world. May every day remind us of the great gift bestowed from above, urging us to live not for fleeting pleasure, but in the name of genuine perfection and meaningful purpose.

If life is the most precious gift, why do many people fail to give it the proper significance?
The answer to this question can be constructed from several aspects highlighted in the provided materials. Firstly, one source emphasizes that life is the greatest gift from God, and thus squandering it by indulging in base passions or an unhealthy lifestyle is considered a serious transgression. As the quote states:
"Among the gifts given by God to man, life is the first and most precious gift. Therefore, wasting this gift by shortening life through the pursuit of passions, corrupt habits, and an unhealthy lifestyle is a grave sin, and the Lord will hold one accountable in Judgment." (source: 1228_6137.txt)

Secondly, another source reveals the problem of self-centeredness and the loss of the true meaning of existence when one lives solely for oneself. This is illustrated by the following quote:
"Sometimes it happens that a person dies, and there is nothing noteworthy to say about him. Well, he died... it's a pity. But why did he live? It’s unclear; he lived only for himself: he got married for himself, had children for himself, worked for himself, studied for himself, dressed for himself; he lived only for himself. And then, what’s the point of living for oneself if you’re going to die anyway?" (source: 9_42.txt)

Thus, one can conclude that many people fail to value life properly because they become distracted by superficial, material, or selfish goals, forgetting its deep, spiritual dimension as a gift meant not for satisfying personal whims, but for higher purposes and self-realization. By focusing on material comforts and personal convenience, people cease to question the profound meaning of existence, causing life to be perceived as something not infinitely precious.

Supporting citation(s):
"Among the gifts given by God to man, life is the first and most precious gift. Therefore, wasting this gift by shortening life through the pursuit of passions, corrupt habits, and an unhealthy lifestyle is a grave sin, and the Lord will hold one accountable in Judgment." (source: 1228_6137.txt)

"Sometimes it happens that a person dies, and there is nothing noteworthy to say about him. Well, he died... it's a pity. But why did he live? It’s unclear; he lived only for himself: he got married for himself, had children for himself, worked for himself, studied for himself, dressed for himself; he lived only for himself. And then, what’s the point of living for oneself if you’re going to die anyway?" (source: 9_42.txt)













The Pistol Misinterpreted as Sacred Symbolism


The analysis of sources clearly demonstrates that the idea of using a pistol as a sort of magical key for symbolic baptism has no basis in existing literature. The discussion in the materials revolves around profound symbolism, issues of spiritual renewal, and traditional concepts of baptism, where the cleansing of sin is perceived as a ritual that offers the chance for the birth of a new, sinless self. The energy of these texts is founded on the belief in the power of traditional symbols, such as the cross, which continues to embody salvation and victory over darkness. In contrast, the idea of a pistol—even in a figurative interpretation—finds no support in any of the sources, as none of the works attribute such a mystical function to it. Thus, despite the variety of approaches to understanding symbolism in contemporary discourse, the sources consistently emphasize the importance of spiritual rebirth through traditional rituals and symbols, leaving little room for non-linear interpretations. This fact emphasizes that spiritual renewal remains a matter of faith and tradition, rather than the latest fashionable metaphor that introduces a surreal twist to sacred practices.

Can a pistol, in a figurative sense, serve as a tetragrammaton, through which some symbolic baptism is carried out?

The analysis of the provided sources did not reveal any direct indications of using a pistol as a symbol functioning as a tetragrammaton for carrying out symbolic baptism. None of the cited materials mentions the pistol in such a context. Although the works discuss symbolism, baptism, and even the weapon of the Antichrist, their semantic categories do not align with the suggested interpretation of the pistol.

For example, one of the sources states:
"Baptism cleanses us of that very shameful wound from the image of God that our progenitor left as an inheritance to all his descendants. That demonic seal of our soul, black and vile, which can only be washed away by true Christian baptism. Baptism signifies the death of the old, sinful man within us and the birth of a new, sinless one." (source: 71_351.txt)

This quote reveals the traditional understanding of baptism as a means of spiritual renewal, without linking it to the image of any weapon.

In another work, symbols and their meanings are discussed:
"A symbol carries the meaning of the idea it expresses, and the idea is nourished by faith. Thus, through a symbol, a spiritual connection is established with the spiritual essence that the symbol represents. Finally, a group of people who adopt and use a symbol unite in the spirit corresponding to that symbol. The symbol of our Lord Jesus Christ—the Cross—has become, for Orthodox believers, an instrument of salvation and a sign of victory over death and the devil." (source: 11_54.txt)

This concept of symbols also does not support the interpretation that a pistol could function similarly to a tetragrammaton in the context of symbolic baptism.

Thus, based on the analyzed data, the idea that a pistol could serve as a tetragrammaton, through which a symbolic baptism is performed, is not supported by the provided sources.

Supporting citation(s):
"Baptism cleanses us of that very shameful wound from the image of God..." (source: 71_351.txt)
"A symbol carries the meaning of the idea it expresses..." (source: 11_54.txt)













The Dual Struggle of Faith


Christian faith is not a simple division of the world into light and darkness; it is a deep acknowledgment of the internal battle between the soul's higher aspirations and its phantom shadows. In the Orthodox worldview, a true disciple of Christ does not reduce all divine reality solely to Jesus, rejecting anything that may appear unworthy. On the contrary, the genuine believer understands the irrationality of one-sided thinking and realizes that within a person coexist the bright aspiration to live according to the commandments and the weaknesses urged by temptations.

This concept is based on the idea of a dual nature, where the human soul simultaneously bears the image of God and the mark of a fallen nature. There is a constant dynamic: on one hand, the striving for holiness, and on the other—the eternal struggle with internal demons. This perspective allows one to see temptations not as an external evil, but as an integral part of human experience that must be recognized, accepted, and overcome in the light of God's grace.

This philosophy calls us to live based on true values so that every manifestation of the soul, every emotion and desire, does not become a source of division but rather a means for spiritual growth and self-knowledge. For only through an honest acknowledgment of our dual nature can we attain true unity with God, where light and darkness are not opposed, but become elements of a complex yet harmonious picture of life.

Is it possible to call a person a true Christian if they believe that everything except Jesus comes from an unworthy, perhaps even diabolical, source?

The answer can be formulated as follows. A true Christian does not confine the entire divine reality to the narrow notion that everything, except Jesus, originates from something unworthy or even diabolical. According to Orthodox teaching, on one hand, we are called to live by Christ’s commandments, and on the other, we battle sin and the forces of evil that penetrate our hearts. One source clearly outlines the dual nature of man: “That is, on the one hand we appear to be disciples of Christ, and on the other hand, our father is the devil. Because we all want to fulfill our own desires, and our desires—by virtue of our sinful nature as humans—often originate from the devil. And a battle occurs within every person between faith, between Christ’s commandments, and the decaying human being inside us. Therefore, it turns out that we belong partly to God and partly to the devil.” (source: 9_42.txt, page: 959). In this context, true Christianity implies the acknowledgment of this internal struggle, rather than a categorical separation of the entire world from the divine source.

Furthermore, another source warns: “Your words burn and torture. Your words torment the conscience because it knows the truth but does not want to face it in the light and is afraid to listen. And we say: either you are a Christian, and then live in a Godly manner, or your father is the devil, and then live in falsehood. There is no other way. By its nature, light cannot mix with darkness... Let’s take the dirtiest dirt and the purest, white cloth and try to combine them. What will we get? We will get a dirty rag.” (source: 9_42.txt, page: 973). Here it is emphasized that the authenticity of the Christian life manifests in choosing to live by the truth and with reverence toward everything that reminds one of God, rather than an excessive tendency to segregate absolutely everything except Jesus as something diabolical.

Thus, if a person believes that everything except Jesus comes from an unworthy or diabolical source, they miss an important aspect of Christian faith – understanding the dual nature of the world created by God, and of the constant struggle of man with temptations. A true Christian strives to live in the light of God’s grace, perceiving everything connected with the divine as a means for elevating the soul, rather than simply discarding it as impure. This is a more balanced view that reflects the internal battle between light and darkness, acknowledged in the Orthodox understanding of faith.

Supporting citation(s):
“That is, on the one hand we appear to be disciples of Christ, and on the other hand, our father is the devil. Because we all want to fulfill our own desires, and our desires—by virtue of our sinful nature as humans—often originate from the devil. And a battle occurs within every person between faith, between Christ’s commandments, and the decaying human being inside us. Therefore, it turns out that we belong partly to God and partly to the devil.” (source: 9_42.txt, page: 959)

“Your words burn and torture. Your words torment the conscience because it knows the truth but does not want to face it in the light and is afraid to listen. And we say: either you are a Christian, and then live in a Godly manner, or your father is the devil, and then live in falsehood. There is no other way. By its nature, light cannot mix with darkness. Let’s take the dirtiest dirt and the purest, white cloth and try to combine them. What will we get? We will get a dirty rag.” (source: 9_42.txt, page: 973)













The Challenge of Reconciling Diverse Meditative Traditions


Spiritual heritage of humanity has always been rich and varied, and modern attempts to create a unified overview of meditative practices only underline this history. In our time, when both pre-Christian and non-Christian traditions are preserved, uniting them into a simple and accessible system has proven to be a true challenge. Limited time resources and the historical-cultural complexities that arose during the formation of spiritual experience make the creation of a universal methodology nearly impossible. Moreover, many concepts associated with meditative practice have deep roots in the church traditions of the Middle Ages, adding an extra layer of difficulty to their modern interpretation. The result is a dynamic picture in which each tradition retains its individuality, preserving a unique historical and cultural imprint. This challenge pushes us to reexamine ancient knowledge and seek new paths to self-knowledge, as it is precisely through their richness and complexity that the infinite potential for spiritual growth lies.
Why has the Planetary Hierarchy not yet proposed a unified form of meditation that is accessible and understandable to ordinary people?
The problem appears not so much to be a matter of unwillingness as it is one of practical and historical-cultural circumstances. As noted in one source, the diversity of pre-Christian and non-Christian forms of spiritual work is so vast that synthesizing them into a single, easily understood and applicable method has proved difficult – "Now indeed many forms of pre-Christian and non-Christian meditations have spread. To answer briefly – we have little time" (source: 1220_6099.txt, page: 1420). This comment indicates that at the time of developing the approach, there were too many disparate traditions, making it impossible to systematically organize them within limited time resources.

Furthermore, it is important to remember that the very concept and terminology related to spiritual work were largely shaped through the church practices of the Middle Ages. It is stated: "The term 'meditation' is neither Indian, nor theosophical, nor any Krishnaite; it simply came from common medieval church practice. It is Latin church practice. Valery Chumakov writes: 'The very idea of becoming a god through meditation appears blasphemous'" (source: 1220_6099.txt, page: 1421). In other words, historically, the complexity and cultural conditioning of these practices complicate the task of their unification.

Thus, the Planetary Hierarchy has likely not yet proposed a unified form that is accessible and understandable to ordinary people because the centuries-old tradition of spiritual experience contains many disparate methods, and both time and historical context have not favored the creation of a unified, simplified system.

Supporting citation(s):
"Now indeed many forms of pre-Christian and non-Christian meditations have spread. To answer briefly – we have little time" (source: 1220_6099.txt, page: 1420).
"The term 'meditation' is neither Indian, nor theosophical, nor any Krishnaite; it simply came from common medieval church practice. It is Latin church practice. Valery Chumakov writes: 'The very idea of becoming a god through meditation appears blasphemous'" (source: 1220_6099.txt, page: 1421).













The Transformative Purification: Beyond Eternal Torment


Imagine a world where hell ceases to be a place of eternal torment and transforms into a temporary stage on the path to perfection. Here, trials and cycles of renewal are not punishments for sins, but an essential process of self-cleansing that allows beings to overcome accumulated imperfections. This dynamic journey begins with the realization that past mistakes turn into valuable experiences that temper the soul in an endless flow of births and renewals.

In this concept, the transitional period resembles a purifying fire in which negativity and imperfect traits gradually give way to wholeness and light. Each new rebirth becomes an opportunity to correct previous shortcomings, fostering personal growth and liberation from the accumulated "shadow." Here, trials are not a punishment, but a necessary event through which the process of rebirth and the realization of true potential occur.

Ultimately, this view on life and death offers hope for transformation and liberation, opening the path to a state where there is no room for eternal suffering. It is precisely through constant self-improvement and purification that each soul has a chance to reach an ideal state of being, where the fire of trials transforms into the light of inner enlightenment.

How can one logically explain the concept of a world without hell, replaced by a process of cleansing from a developing demon, in the context of multiple lives?

In the logical explanation of the idea of a world without eternal hell—where “hell” is replaced by a process of cleansing—the following scheme can be observed: instead of perceiving hell as an endless, inevitable punishment, the state that we traditionally associate with hell is understood as a transitional stage on the path to a being’s perfection. In other words, the so-called “hellish experience” is not eternal condemnation, but a necessary trial for beings in a state of incomplete existence, who, through repeated cycles of “dying” and “resurrecting” (in the context of multiple lives), undergo a cleansing process.

As emphasized in one of the sources, “the meaning of hellish existence is that it should cease to exist. For the imperfect, those insufficiently desirous of existence... the creature of its semi-being is the only possible path that leads to its perfection without impairing its freedom...” (source: 1275_6374.txt). Here, hell does not appear as a final, eternal place of torment, but rather as a necessary stage during which an essence, unworthy of complete existence, gradually passes through a state of “life through death” and “semi-resurrection.” This process can be understood as a cleansing from what can conditionally be termed the “developing demon”—an accumulation of negative or imperfect traits requiring transformation.

Thus, from a reincarnational perspective, each life and each rebirth provides an opportunity to correct the errors of previous existence. There is no eternal condemnation—only the successive overcoming and elimination of accumulated imperfections, ultimately allowing one to reach a state of wholeness in which “hell” is no longer present. It is exactly through this dynamic process of cleansing and self-improvement that the demon (symbolizing burgeoning darkness or accumulated negative tendencies) is gradually neutralized, giving way to light and unity.

Supporting citation(s):
“The meaning of hellish existence is that it should cease to exist. For the imperfect, insufficiently desirous of existence—that is, essentially not desirous of existence—the creature of its semi-being is the only possible path that leads to its perfection without impairing its freedom, that makes it perfect and its self-perfection. This age ‘passes,’ i.e. exists as neither being nor non-being, neither dying–resurrection, but as ‘living death,’ as semi-being–semi-non-being, half-dying–half-resurrection, so that it does not ‘pass,’ but to be, not to be, die and resurrect.” (source: 1275_6374.txt)













Beyond Dogma: The Transformative Power of Inner Faith


Religion has always been much more than just a set of dogmas or external attributes. It is a dynamic process of inner search, where every person strives to discover their own truth and, in doing so, opens new horizons of the soul. Even if some manifestations may appear absurd or strange from the outside, the true essence of religion lies deep within personal experience and inner transformation, capable of radically changing one’s life.

The main idea here is that religion is directed towards the individual. It calls not merely for adherence to commonly accepted norms, but for a deep and sincere faith that can unlock access to one’s true self through spiritual awakening. When a person finds God, they not only gain an object of worship but also begin to understand themselves, embodying internal changes that arise from within rather than being imposed from without.

It is important to note that superficial manifestations, which are often perceived by society as absurd or even ridiculous, may serve merely as an outer shell concealing a much deeper spiritual truth. It is in this context that religion transcends simple ideologies, offering something more—a genuine, personal, and transformative experience that can change a person forever. Thus, each of us can find in religion not only faith but also the answer to the question, “Who am I really?”

Does religion have any meaning without the presence of elementary idiocy and silly manifestations that perhaps add a certain color to it? Religion, by its very nature, is oriented towards deep personal experience, the search for truth, and the transformation of the individual—principles that go far beyond superficial aspects, even if public perception sometimes includes elements that might be called idiocy or foolishness. For example, one source notes that true revelation, even if perceived by some as absurd (“madness for the Greeks”), possesses divine purity and the uniqueness of its message:

“We preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block for Jews and folly to the Greeks” (source: 529_2644.txt).

This statement underscores that the essence of religion does not lie in surface manifestations but in the profound power of spiritual transformation that affects each person individually. Another source draws a clear distinction between religion and ideology, emphasizing that religion is always directed towards the individual and calls on one to believe so that, in finding God, they find themselves:

“Deep down ideology — is of course an ersatz, a substitute for religion. But the difference, and a huge difference, between religion and ideology is that religion, faith — is always something very personal, impossible without a deep personal and inner experience, whereas ideology... The purpose, the essence of religion — is that upon finding God, a person would find themselves” (source: 1835_9170.txt).

Thus, the meaning of religion does not depend on the presence of elements of idiocy or seemingly foolish manifestations that might only serve as embellishments for a more complex and profound content. The central point is that genuine spirituality and religious consciousness are based on an inner search, experience, and transformation—not on external attributes or stereotypical displays.













Duality on the Cross: Unveiling Yin and Yang Symbolism


Entering into the deep symbolism of the crucifixion, we encounter a fascinating interpretation that at first appears to be a simple historical fact, yet reveals the essence of the contrast between light and darkness. Placing Jesus on the cross alongside two robbers not only underscores the agonizing suffering but also opens up the possibility to see in this event a dialogue of opposing forces: good and evil, life and death. The core of this symbolic narrative prompts us to contemplate how the ancient mythological image of Yin and Yang is intertwined with real historical events. Here, the suffering and torments become not merely elements of a tragic scene, but rather a powerful visual and philosophical signal, indicating the eternal clash of the inner force of light with dark shadows. In conclusion, one might say that such an interpretation not only takes us back to the roots of spiritual heritage but also invites the modern reader to a profound reflection on the duality of human nature, where each side holds its undeniable significance and strength.

Can the crucifixion on Mount Zion, where two robbers were present alongside Jesus, be interpreted as a symbol of Yin and Yang?

The analysis of the crucifixion along with the two robbers as a symbol reflecting the contrast between light and darkness indeed finds confirmation in one of the sources. In document "11_52.txt" it is stated:
"At that time, with Him, on the right and left, two robbers were crucified. The crucifixion represented a torturous death. They could not even give Jesus water, and the 'guilt' fell on Him, Who was the true King of the Jews. These events and torments emphasize the contrast between light and darkness, which can be interpreted as a symbol of Yin and Yang."

Based on this, it can be asserted that this interpretative approach focuses precisely on duality – the contrast between light and darkness, which is reflected in the symbolism of Yin and Yang. This allows us to view the crucifixion on Mount Zion not merely as a historical event, but also as a profound symbolic image where opposing forces (good and evil, light and darkness) engage in a dialogue.

Supporting citation(s):
"At that time, with Him, on the right and left, two robbers were crucified. The crucifixion represented a torturous death. They could not even give Jesus water, and the 'guilt' fell on Him, Who was the true King of the Jews. These events and torments emphasize the contrast between light and darkness, which can be interpreted as a symbol of Yin and Yang." (source: 11_52.txt)













Dynamic Energy: Rethinking the Foundations of Matter


Modern science has overturned our understanding of the world of elementary particles, opening new horizons in comprehending the nature of matter. Thanks to advanced experimental methods at high-energy accelerators, scientists have managed to detect over 300 types of particles, each with unique characteristics such as mass, charge, and spin. These discoveries confirm that particles are far from static "bricks" but are dynamic structures capable of transformation and interaction at the fundamental level.

At the core of this approach is the idea that matter consists of concentrations of energy and electromagnetic fields, where each particle exhibits both corpuscular and wave properties simultaneously. This perspective allows us to view matter as a mobile and mutable phenomenon, in which elementary transformations occur according to strict energy conservation laws. This implies that even when the form of a particular manifestation of matter changes, its energy basis remains intact, serving as the link between various states of substance—from solids to gaseous forms and to manifestations of electromagnetic radiation.

Thus, modern experimental data and theoretical models capture the essence of matter as something far more complex and dynamic than previously imagined. Our worldview is expanding, opening prospects for new research and a deeper understanding of the fundamental laws that govern the Universe. This scientific progress not only revives research at the frontiers of physics but also inspires us to further search for the truth in the mysterious world of elementary particles.

How does modern science justify the existence of elementary particles?
Modern science justifies the existence of elementary particles through a combination of experimental data obtained from powerful accelerators and theoretical models that describe their energetic nature and interactions. After World War II, high-energy experiments established the existence of over 300 particles, both those observed experimentally and those theoretically predicted. In particular, it is noted:

"After World War II, thanks to the use of modern experimental techniques, and primarily powerful accelerators creating conditions of high energy and enormous speeds, the existence of a large number of elementary particles—over 300—was established. Among them are both experimentally discovered and theoretically calculated particles, including resonances, quarks, and virtual particles. The primary characteristics of elementary particles are mass, charge, average lifetime, spin, and quantum numbers." (source: 1694_8467.txt)

Furthermore, modern views maintain that matter is essentially an electromagnetic field and concentrations of energy exhibiting both corpuscular and wave properties simultaneously. This approach explains that elementary particles are not considered immovable "bricks" but rather dynamic structures capable of transforming and interacting at the level of fundamental energies. This is illustrated in the following excerpt:

"The concept of matter as an immutable substance underwent a decisive revision in the 20th century. The atoms composing all bodies are spaced at enormous distances relative to their own sizes... Thus, matter is best described as tiny islands of substance in an ocean of emptiness... From the perspective of modern physics, only a certain collection of particles—considered as an energetic medium—possesses the status of reality, with no part being entirely independent of the whole." (source: 603_3013.txt)

An additional important aspect is the notion that transformations in the form of matter occur under the law of energy conservation: particles can change their mass, and their form of existence can interconvert with electromagnetic radiation. This confirms that the energy basis of matter remains unchanged even as its specific manifestation varies:

"From the fact that particles can change their mass... one cannot conclude that matter disappears; another form of matter should be considered as the electromagnetic field. Both forms can transition into each other, much like a liquid can transform into a solid or gaseous state. However, such transformations can only occur under the conditions dictated by energy conservation laws. Energy cannot vanish or be created from nothing; it can only change its material envelope while remaining quantitatively the same." (source: 192_956.txt)

Thus, modern science relies on experimental confirmations obtained at high energies and the understanding that elementary particles are dynamic concentrations of energy capable of transitioning from one form of matter to another while conserving energy. This unified energy concept provides an explanation for their existence and properties.