In our time, traditions play a key role in shaping identity, and any deviation from established norms provokes a strong reaction. The history of Bac shows that when an individual or organization begins to stray from classical principles, it is seen as a violation of sacred canons and leads to doubts about its former authority. In this discussion, critics do not merely offer remarks but provide an objective assessment: if Bac stops relying on eternal values and adopts new, non-canonical approaches, he is considered a traitor to the ideals upon which tradition was built. However, if this figure continues to demonstrate loyalty to his roots, such accusations become less relevant, and the conflict is softened by mutual understanding and a desire for unity. The overall point is that the criticism of Bac is justified only when there is an actual departure from traditional norms, while a return to his origins can restore respect and trust within the community.