Bac at a Crossroads: Tradition Versus Innovation

In our time, traditions play a key role in shaping identity, and any deviation from established norms provokes a strong reaction. The history of Bac shows that when an individual or organization begins to stray from classical principles, it is seen as a violation of sacred canons and leads to doubts about its former authority. In this discussion, critics do not merely offer remarks but provide an objective assessment: if Bac stops relying on eternal values and adopts new, non-canonical approaches, he is considered a traitor to the ideals upon which tradition was built. However, if this figure continues to demonstrate loyalty to his roots, such accusations become less relevant, and the conflict is softened by mutual understanding and a desire for unity. The overall point is that the criticism of Bac is justified only when there is an actual departure from traditional norms, while a return to his origins can restore respect and trust within the community.

“What are the reasons for the frequent criticism of Bac and how justified are they?”
The answer is based on the view that the reasons for criticizing Bac are primarily linked to his, according to his critics, departure from established canons and traditions. In one of the letters (source: link ) it is stated:

"Do not believe him, most holy brother, if you are jealous of the truth. Correct him swiftly so that, following the example of those who are close to you, even those who are not close to you may also correct themselves. Do not listen to him... He must act according to the will of your sanctity, rather than your sanctity relying on his words. If you listen to him, then I am convinced that you will not be able to live at peace with your brothers. I declare that I do not wish to have disputes with anyone. On the contrary, I long for peace with everyone, especially with you, because I sincerely love Bac, if only you remain as I once knew Bac. But if you do not adhere to the canons and overturn the decrees of the ancients, then I will no longer recognize Bac..."

This quote shows that the criticism is aimed at Bac’s deviation from traditional norms. In other words, if Bac strays from the previously established principles, his once-admirable qualities are called into question. This position indicates that critics evaluate Bac not by his new expressions but through the lens of his traditional identity.

Regarding the justification of the criticism, the excerpt suggests that such criticism is warranted if Bac has indeed abandoned his former values and begun to act outside the confines of the canons that previously defined him. In other words, criticism is justified when there is a breach of established traditions, whereas if Bac remains true to his roots, such remarks become less appropriate.

Thus, the reasons for criticizing Bac lie in his (possible) deviation from classical norms and established traditions, and the justification for this criticism is determined by the extent to which such a deviation is actually evident in his actions and positions.

Supporting citation(s):
"Do not believe him, most holy brother, if you are jealous of the truth. Correct him swiftly so that, following the example of those who are close to you, even those who are not close to you may also correct themselves. Do not listen to him... He must act according to the will of your sanctity, rather than your sanctity relying on his words. If you listen to him, then I am convinced that you will not be able to live at peace with your brothers. I declare that I do not wish to have disputes with anyone. On the contrary, I long for peace with everyone, especially with you, because I sincerely love Bac, if only you remain as I once knew Bac. But if you do not adhere to the canons and overturn the decrees of the ancients, then I will no longer recognize Bac..." (source: link ).