Breadcrumbs Breadcrumbs

The path to freedom through truth







The Complexity of Fulfilling Basic Needs in a Modern World


The modern world poses new challenges to individuals, complicating the process of satisfying basic life needs. The starting point lies in the fact that our physiological needs are always mediated by the influence of sociocultural norms and rules that shape our behavior. These established frameworks determine how and to what extent a person can satisfy natural needs while adhering to standards of decency and traditions passed down through generations.

Against this backdrop, the influence of the modern economic system is clearly evident, where the dynamics of excessive consumption coexist with strict control over basic goods. Such a system often transforms primary needs—including those of an intimate nature—into objects of economic relations, making them an accessible commodity for some and an unattainable luxury for others. This phenomenon underscores an imbalance, as even the most elemental aspects of human life are confined within the limits of market relations.

Finally, despite a long process of cultural development, modern society has yet to create a sustainable psychological environment capable of providing each member with a sense of fulfillment and inner harmony. Constant pressure, negative emotions, and feelings of failure add further barriers to the complete satisfaction of basic needs.

Thus, the intersection of individual aspirations and the complex sociocultural and economic realities creates a multifaceted problem that requires a comprehensive approach. After all, it is in the quest for balance between personal desires and external constraints that the key to true well-being is found.

Why do individuals face difficulties in meeting basic needs, and how is this connected to modern challenges? The answer encompasses several aspects related to why basic needs often remain unmet and how modern challenges impact this process.

Firstly, the satisfaction of vital-organic—that is, physiological—needs is often mediated by the conditions of the sociocultural environment, where rules of decency, etiquette, and historically established norms play a decisive role. As noted:
"It is important to note that the satisfaction of vital-organic needs is mediated by the conditions of the sociocultural environment, the rules of decency, and etiquette. Egocentric-personal needs are linked to the self-affirmation of the individual. They are usually aimed at achieving certain distinctive advantages in the social sphere and in the realm of material possessions. Egocentric-personal needs are historically and culturally determined." (source: 131_654.txt)

Secondly, the modern economic system imposes its own constraints. The prevailing economic dominance, in particular, is capable of suppressing even significant needs such as sexual ones. This leads to a situation where, under conditions of excessive consumption on one hand and suppression of basic needs on the other, the satisfaction of sexual needs becomes incomplete—available as a commodity of everyday demand for some and as an object of unattainable luxury for others. As stated:
"Sexual needs cannot be fully satisfied because they are suppressed by the existing economic dominance. In conditions of excessive consumption on one hand and the suppression of basic needs on the other, sex takes on the properties of a commodity for everyday demand for some, and an object of unattainable luxury for others." (source: 223_1114.txt)

Moreover, modern society, despite its prolonged cultural development, has not learned to guarantee psychological well-being for each of its members, which also creates obstacles to the satisfaction of needs. The lack of a stable psychological climate, coupled with negative emotions related to feelings of failure and disappointment, affects one’s ability to feel content with the basic aspects of existence. To confirm this, it is stated:
"Human society, despite millennia of cultural development, has not learned to guarantee psychological well-being (not to mention happiness!) to each of its members." (source: 79_393.txt)

Thus, difficulties in satisfying basic needs arise from the complex interrelations between individual needs and sociocultural-economic conditions, where modern challenges—such as economic pressure, an unstable psychological climate, and rigid social norms—significantly complicate the process of meeting these needs.



Read More










The Fragility of Strength: When Allies Turn on You


In the world of ideologies and authorities, even the most powerful leader is not immune to betrayal by his own defenders if his position weakens. This image warns us against the illusion of unconditional support—when a strong figure becomes vulnerable, close allies may turn against it like loyal dogs capable of harming their master. At the heart of this metaphor is the idea that even the strongest structures are fragile; the force that inspires can turn into a dangerous weapon of self-destruction, leaving nothing but chaos behind. The call not to place blind faith in potent ideologies reminds us that one should not resort to powerful but unpredictable tools, as their reaction could be devastating. Ultimately, the metaphor serves as a cautionary signal, urging us to rethink the principles of support and leadership in times of change and uncertainty.

How can one interpret the metaphorical image "7 dogs of a wounded wolf" and what message might it carry?

The metaphorical image "7 dogs of a wounded wolf" can be understood as a warning that even the closest allies or supporters of a strong, authoritative force can turn against it in moments of vulnerability. That is, when the main figure (the wolf) is injured or weakened, it loses its ability to control its "dogs" – those who normally serve as its protection. In this situation, those who once supported the authority with all their might may begin to act to its detriment—similar to the quote stating that "of all the dogs, constantly biting 'N. Mir', one became guilty, fought back—and now bites its own." This depiction reflects an internal danger and nihilism, illustrating that even those considered loyal can strike if their leader shows weakness.

Moreover, the text’s reference to the proverb "don't call a wolf for help against dogs" underscores that employing power based on ideologically charged concepts (as with Marxism in this context) is perilous, precisely because even the most robust and inspiring images can turn into instruments of self-destruction if they become uncontrollable. In other words, it is a call not to use such a powerful but dangerous weapon (or ideology), since it is capable of wounding not only the enemy but also its bearer: "Even against hostile, malevolent dogs, do not call upon the Marxist wolf for aid; strike them with an honest stick—and do not call the wolf. Because the wolf will devour your own liver."

Thus, the image of "7 dogs of a wounded wolf" symbolizes the fragility of even the mightiest structures and warns against the illusion of unconditional support. It indicates that a leader’s weakness may lead its closest defenders to turn against it, ultimately resulting in the self-destruction of the system.

Supporting citation(s):
"The emotional shock was—settle the score for one's eternal oppression: of all the dogs, constantly biting 'N. Mir', one was at fault, fought back—and now bites its own. Seizing the situation, it seemed convenient to strike us as well! How to strike?—with Marxism, of course, the purest, most Progressive Doctrine. This was very similar to Dementyev. But at least one person in the editorial office—Tvardovsky—could have remembered and understood the proverb: don't call a wolf for help against dogs. Even against hostile, malevolent dogs, do not call upon the Marxist wolf for aid; strike them with an honest stick—and do not call the wolf. Because the wolf will devour your own liver." (source: 1342_6705.txt)

"And therefore the reasoning and tone of this shameful magazine's speech were not accidental nor were they mistaken—not long before its end." (source: 1342_6705.txt)



Read More










Urban Overload: Unraveling Anxiety in Crowded Spaces


In our modern urban environment, where constant noise, bright lights, and a multitude of irritating factors have become the norm, it is not surprising that many people experience inner tension and anxiety. This discussion begins with the understanding that an excess of stimuli—the continual presence of people, intrusive external irritants, and social pressure—creates an atmosphere of claustrophobia and depression.

The core focus is on the impact of various factors that contribute to an overall feeling of insecurity. The first obvious factor is physical overload: street noise, glaring lights, and sharp smells literally suffocate, depriving one of the opportunity to relax and find peace. Alongside this, social influence—manifested by the relentless attention of others and the constant scrutiny of public opinion—adds a sense of lost individuality, thereby intensifying internal anxiety. Environmental shortcomings, inherent in urban life, lead to the depletion of the nervous system, as the continuous exposure to adverse conditions triggers sharp psychological reactions. Particularly, people who are sensitive or predisposed to mental disorders face a real challenge, as even minimal external irritants can provoke panic or anxiety attacks.

In conclusion, the interplay of physical, social, and environmental factors makes existing in crowded places a genuine challenge to mental well-being. Recognizing these causes is the first step in seeking solutions, whether through altering the urban landscape or developing personal stress-management strategies. In this context, it is crucial not only to understand the nature of the problem but also to actively pursue ways to create spaces where personal calm and energy can be restored even amid the urban bustle.

What factors can cause a feeling of anxiety or discomfort in crowded places?

The feeling of anxiety and discomfort in crowded places can arise from a variety of reasons associated with the urban environment and social pressure. Key factors include:

1. Excessive crowding accompanied by constant noise, bright lights, and sharp, often unpleasant smells. These myriad external irritants create a sense of confinement and oppression, leading to heightened stress levels. As stated in one source:
"Urban life is filled with various stresses and fears—a lot of them. Large crowds only intensify anxiety." (source: 223_1114.txt)

2. The constant influence of public opinion and social control, where one feels the pressure of the gaze of others. This pressure may lead to a loss of individuality and increase internal unease.

3. The negative impact of the surrounding environment: noise, dirt, poor ecological conditions, and the ongoing presence of multiple irritants can drain the nervous system. This is supported by findings that "a large number of irritants, such as noise, a low-oxygen environment, bright lights, and an excessive number of people, provoke acute psychological reactions." (source: 1350_6746.txt)

4. For individuals with heightened sensitivity or a predisposition to mental disorders, constant activity and crowding can prove to be a real torment. Even minor external factors in such situations are capable of triggering acute anxiety or panic attacks.

Thus, the combination of physical (noise, light, smells), social (public pressure, control), and environmental (urban noise, pollution) factors results in crowded places provoking intense anxiety and discomfort in people.

Supporting citation(s):
"Urban life is filled with various stresses and fears—a lot of them. Large crowds only intensify anxiety." (source: 223_1114.txt)
"For people prone to various types of mental disorders, being in public places can be a real torture. It has been observed that a large number of irritants, such as noise, a low-oxygen environment, bright lights, and an excessive number of people, trigger acute psychological reactions." (source: 1350_6746.txt)



Read More










The True Measure of Repentance


In the pursuit of understanding how much a person deserves an apology, it is important to pay attention to their ability to acknowledge mistakes and genuinely regret what they have done. If a person is incapable of openly admitting their own misdeeds, leaving room for excuses, it is difficult to speak of true repentance. Such an approach calls into question their moral responsibility and capacity for self-analysis. By analyzing an individual's behavior, we see that a refusal to engage in self-criticism and a reluctance to change—even when their actions clearly deviate from generally accepted norms—can serve as strong grounds for withholding forgiveness. When an individual does not strive to understand and make amends for their mistakes, their attempts to apologize become nothing more than an empty gesture, devoid of real meaning. This perspective helps us clearly distinguish who truly deserves forgiveness and who remains in delusion, unwilling to accept responsibility for their actions.

What grounds can be cited for considering some people unworthy of apologies?

The grounds for considering certain people unworthy of apologies can be found in their inability to sincerely acknowledge their mistakes and in the lack of genuine repentance for what they have done. If a person is not willing to openly admit their misdeeds, to offer a sincere “I’m sorry” without resorting to excuses, then their refusal to engage in self-condemnation casts doubt on their moral responsibility for their actions. As one of the sources states:

"To acknowledge one's sins means to say that such and such sin was committed by us; and to confess them means to condemn oneself for them, to say, 'I'm at fault,' without allowing any excuses or apologies. 'I have sinned, I am at fault'—these two words must be spoken above all, spoken sincerely." (source: 1465_7321.txt)

Furthermore, if a person continues to act against generally accepted norms and the laws of nature, refusing to change or admit their mistake, such insistence on delusion can also serve as grounds for refusing to accept their apology. This opinion is reflected in the following passage:

"It appears that none of us truly follow the laws of nature. If among you there are people who are exceptions, I offer them my apologies. To these people I would advise reading some other book, because everything I am about to discuss here does not pertain to them. So, let us return to ordinary human beings. I hope that you will not misunderstand what I am about to say." (source: 760_3797.txt)

Thus, a moral deficiency in the standard of self-criticism and an inability to change one’s behavior can serve as serious grounds for considering a person unworthy of apologies. If a person does not understand and admit their sins, does not feel genuine remorse, and continues to act contrary to moral norms, then they have lost the opportunity to earn forgiveness from both their loved ones and within a broader moral context.

Supporting citation(s):
"To acknowledge one's sins means to say that such and such sin was committed by us; and to confess them means to condemn oneself for them, to say, 'I'm at fault,' without allowing any excuses or apologies. 'I have sinned, I am at fault'—these two words must be spoken above all, spoken sincerely." (source: 1465_7321.txt)

"It appears that none of us truly follow the laws of nature. If among you there are people who are exceptions, I offer them my apologies. To these people I would advise reading some other book, because everything I am about to discuss here does not pertain to them. So, let us return to ordinary human beings. I hope that you will not misunderstand what I am about to say." (source: 760_3797.txt)



Read More










Tradition's Burden: Male Ideals, Duty, and Divorce


In modern society, entrenched concepts of marriage and male roles create a powerful pressure that demands not only genuine love from a man but also unconditional fidelity, stability, and moral responsibility toward the family. We live in an era when traditional standards impose an ideal in which personal relationships resemble a sacred covenant, where love interweaves with duty and keeping promises becomes an integral part of family harmony.

The central idea running through many cultural materials is that marriage is not merely a romantic adventure but a serious commitment that requires personal devotion and social correctness. In this context, the image of a man is highlighted as a reliable pillar who must exhibit exceptional stability and adhere to high moral standards. Any deviation from the traditionally expected model of behavior is seen not as a personal mistake but as an undermining of the relationship’s foundation, which in turn can lead to tragic consequences such as divorce, regarded by society with condemnation.

Absorbing the energy and strength of traditional views, we observe how society molds a standard where female devotion and support depend on a man’s ability to meet a narrow set of requirements. A breach of social norms—whether through emotional instability or failure to keep promises—can serve as a trigger for criticism and rupture, contributing to mounting pressure on the individual.

In conclusion, traditional stereotypes about male interactions not only shape societal expectations but also gauge the real value of devotion, responsibility, and stability in marriage. In a world where love and duty are intertwined, increasing importance is placed on the strength of character and moral accountability, making issues of divorce and adherence to established norms not merely personal failures but societal trials.

How are traditional stereotypes about male relationships reflected in matters of divorce and loyalty, and what social expectations do they form? Traditional stereotypes regarding men's relationships create expectations that a man must show not only love but also unwavering loyalty and a sense of duty to the family. These views assert that marriage is, above all, a commitment in which fulfilling promises and upholding moral standards are essential parts of the partnership.

For example, a piece from file 1053_5262.txt states:
"Thus, everything is at stake... When two people find lasting happiness, they are obliged not by wild infatuation..."
This quote underscores that a happy marriage is seen as the result of fulfilling certain obligations, where love gives way to responsibility and fidelity. According to such perspectives, men must demonstrate reliability and stability, which is regarded as a key criterion in assessing their personal qualities.

Expectations for conformity to a certain ideal are also clearly visible in another source, from file 288_1436.txt, which notes:
"She is not his friend and companion in all aspects of life, but only when he conforms to her 'civil' ideal..."
This idea indicates that female devotion and support depend on the extent to which a man adheres to specific social and cultural norms. Any violation of these rules or failure to conform—be it through broken promises or a lack of emotional support—can be seen as betrayal and serve as a reason for divorce.

Furthermore, the traditional understanding of marriage as something sacred, where love and duty are closely intertwined, is also reflected in the following quote from the same file:
"Marriage is not a contract; marriage is a mystery in which there is as much love as there is duty..."
Here, the idea emerges that a man’s personal and moral responsibility forms the foundation of family relationships. Such norms intensify the pressure on men, creating an expectation of unconditional loyalty, and any deviation from this standard may lead to a breakdown of the relationship, accompanied by public disapproval.

This approach to framing the issue of divorce and fidelity is also evident in the perception of divorce as a tragic event when the failure to meet obligations leads to the destruction of the family institution. As noted in a piece from file 9_42.txt:
"What happens to people if their marriage did not come to fruition?... On one hand, of course, every divorce is a tragedy..."
This again emphasizes that any departure from traditional relationship models is viewed not only as a personal failure but also as a breach of established social expectations.

Supporting citation(s):
"Thus, everything is at stake... When two people find lasting happiness, they are obliged not by wild infatuation..." (source: 1053_5262.txt)
"She is not his friend and companion in all aspects of life, but only when he conforms to her 'civil' ideal..." (source: 288_1436.txt)
"Marriage is not a contract; marriage is a mystery in which there is as much love as there is duty..." (source: 288_1436.txt)
"What happens to people if their marriage did not come to fruition?... On one hand, of course, every divorce is a tragedy..." (source: 9_42.txt)

Thus, traditional stereotypes about male relationships emphasize that a man is obligated to be a dependable bearer of moral and family values. Any loss of this status—whether through broken promises or deviation from the ideal—is seen as a serious violation, ultimately contributing to the distress associated with divorce and the formation of rigid social expectations regarding male loyalty.



Read More










Balancing Order and Spiritual Freedom


In contemporary Russia, the prohibition of magicians, fortune-tellers, and esoteric practitioners has become a vivid reflection of conflicting societal demands: on one hand, state policy is aimed at preserving social order and protecting citizens from practices that might harm their health and public stability, while on the other, efforts to restrict alternative forms of spiritual expression spark intense public debate.

The introduction of such a ban is supported by concerns that activities based on magic and occultism might lead to subjugation to established “secret” laws, whereby control over reality is achieved through manipulating inevitable forces. This perspective transforms magic into a form of domination, wherein the practice itself becomes an instrument stripped of true freedom, leaving individuals under the power of mysterious and potentially dangerous mechanisms.

The main body of the law reflects the state's desire to protect its citizens from actions capable of disrupting not only public order but also deep-seated spiritual norms. Historical practices of harsh measures against those who violated established standards indicate that such sanctions were applied not only to magical rituals but also to other forms of alternative religious expression. Thus, the legislation conflicts with the concept of freedom of worship, endangering those forms of spiritual practice that do not conform to traditional and publicly approved norms.

In conclusion, the ban on the activities of esoteric practitioners resonates strongly in society, provoking debates about the balance between protecting citizens and preserving the right to individual spiritual expression. This law not only reflects a desire to shield the population from potential risks but also raises the question: where is the boundary between necessary public safety measures and the restriction of a freedom so vital to every person? This contradiction compels us to engage in deep analysis and seek compromise solutions that can reconcile the protection of traditions with respect for the diversity of beliefs.

What might the ban on the activities of magicians, fortune-tellers, and esoteric practitioners in Russia signify, and what consequences could it have for religious freedom of expression?

The ban on the activities of magicians, fortune-tellers, and esoteric practitioners in Russia can be understood as a measure aimed at limiting practices perceived as dangerous to public order and citizens' health, as well as an attempt to preserve the “purity” of the religious tradition from what is considered fragmented and manipulative. On the one hand, such a ban can be explained by concerns that magic and its related practices do not rely on genuine freedom of spirit but represent subjugation to inevitable laws—a means by which a person seeks to gain control over the surrounding world. This is stated in the following quote:

"The occult is essentially the realm of magic, i.e., necessity rather than freedom. Magic is the domination over the world through understanding the necessity and regularity of the mysterious forces of the world. I have not seen freedom of spirit in people fascinated by the occult. They did not control occult forces—occult power controlled them." (source: 1000_4995.txt)

On the other hand, such a legislative measure could have far-reaching consequences for religious freedom of expression. In a situation where the state establishes strict boundaries regarding which spiritual practices are permissible, there is a risk that not only controversial magical rituals but also other forms of extra-canonical religious expression could be banned or persecuted. Historically, such measures have been accompanied by severe punishments for those who violated established norms, as illustrated in the following excerpt:

"One who engages in enchantment, which leads to carnal desire disguised as chaste thoughts, or who plots against the salvation of people, is punished by confiscation of property to the state treasury and exile. Let no one question one who claims to be a prophet: for sorcerers are subjected to the death penalty. Those summoning demons to harm people must be punished by the sword." (source: 805_4024.txt)

Thus, the ban can be interpreted as an attempt by the state to protect its citizens from practices that are considered not only dubious from a scientific perspective but also potentially harmful to social and religious stability. However, implementing such measures inevitably sparks debates: on one side, about the necessity to safeguard public norms, and on the other, about the possibility that such a ban might significantly narrow the space for self-expression for those whose spiritual beliefs extend beyond accepted, officially sanctioned traditions.

Supporting citation(s):
"The occult is essentially the realm of magic, i.e., necessity rather than freedom. Magic is the domination over the world through understanding the necessity and regularity of the mysterious forces of the world. I have not seen freedom of spirit in people fascinated by the occult. They did not control occult forces—occult power controlled them." (source: 1000_4995.txt)

"One who engages in enchantment, which leads to carnal desire disguised as chaste thoughts, or who plots against the salvation of people, is punished by confiscation of property to the state treasury and exile. Let no one question one who claims to be a prophet: for sorcerers are subjected to the death penalty. Those summoning demons to harm people must be punished by the sword." (source: 805_4024.txt)



Read More










The Church: A Path to Transformative Union with God


Throughout the history of humanity, many institutions have emerged, but few possess such a profound spiritual mission as the Church established by Jesus Christ. From His very first step on the earthly path, the Savior showed people that true understanding of God is revealed through personal faith and an intimate encounter with His essence. He came into this world not merely as a moral teacher, but as the One who grants each individual the opportunity to become close to the Heavenly Father.

At the heart of the Church’s creation lies the idea of transforming human life through faith. Jesus Christ, upon entering history, affirmed His mission by emphasizing both personal and communal knowledge of God. His life, death, and resurrection became the paradigm of how, through accepting the heavenly gift and undergoing inner transformation, anyone can attain the status of God’s child, enter eternal life, and become part of a new spiritual family. This community is not limited to the boundaries of a conventional moral alliance; rather, it paves the way to a profound and vibrant understanding of the Kingdom of God, where mystery, adherence to commandments, and sincere faith play a decisive role.

In conclusion, the Church founded by Christ remains a unique spiritual guide for those who yearn for a new meaning and union with God. Within this unification of souls lies the power of transformation, capable of inspiring every individual to embark on a life journey filled with faith, love, and hope.

The author asserts that Jesus Christ created the Church, and the essence of this organization is that, through it, a person can come to know God and gain a new spiritual community. In other words, the Church is not just a moral association of people but a means through which, by believing in Christ, one can understand the Heavenly Father, become a child of God, and enter eternal life.

Details are set out in one excerpt, which states:
"The Lord came to found the Church. He established it with His Blood. Man can perceive something unattainable by mere resemblance; therefore, the Son of God took on human flesh so that each one of us might, by likeness, understand and apprehend the Heavenly Father. God became man so that man might become God, as the holy fathers once said. Thus, whoever comes to know Jesus Christ thereby comes to know the Heavenly Father and can enter eternal life, hearing what the Father has conveyed to him through the Son. The only task for man on earth is to know the Son of God, and for that, we must believe in Him." (source: 9_44.txt)

Another excerpt describes how Christ, through His actions by choosing and teaching His followers, created a new spiritual family:
"So what did the Lord do as He walked the earth? He built the Church. He chose for Himself, from all the Jewish people, devoted husbands and wives... And the Lord taught these people about the Kingdom of God; He taught them that He is the Son of God, descended from heaven, and that if they clothed themselves with power from above and believed in His Resurrection, they would become His brothers. And once they become brothers to Christ—and Christ is the Son of God—they will, in this way, be adopted by God the Father, that is, they will be called children of God. If one considers noble ancestry from a great military leader, artist, or writer as high, then how much higher is the nobility of being of God, the title of the Son of God! And the Lord created the Church to form a new, spiritual family from among the people." (source: 9_44.txt)

Thus, according to the author, Jesus Christ instituted the Church so that, through it, people who believe in Him can be reunited with God, gaining knowledge of Him through the revelation embedded in His incarnation, death, and resurrection. This community possesses an inner essence based on unity with God, conveyed through faith, sacraments, and the observance of His commandments.



Read More










Embracing Inner Harmony: The Rejection of Religious Fanaticism


Modern society is increasingly renouncing religious fanaticism, realizing that its roots lie in distorted spiritual development and a loss of moral benchmarks. Today, many are convinced that true inner enrichment begins with a deep and balanced spiritual life, where the focus is on self-improvement rather than on dogmatism and violence. This stance helps avoid extreme views that can shatter social bonds and sow division among communities.

A key role is played by solid moral principles and clear spiritual benchmarks, which help distinguish genuine values from oversimplified and often rigid interpretations. When a person is oriented toward inner harmony rather than an external doctrine, they become equipped with knowledge and critical thinking that enable them to resist the influence of radical ideas. An essential factor in this process is quality education, which not only stokes an interest in a deeper understanding of the world but also cultivates the ability to analyze complex issues without falling prey to manipulation.

Thus, active opposition to fanaticism lies in a harmonious combination of inner personal development and external educational efforts. This approach not only safeguards against extremism but also lays the foundation for a society characterized by mutual respect, openness, and constructive dialogue—a modern path toward reducing discord and forming a resilient, tolerant social environment.

What underlying reasons might be at the root of the rejection of religious fanaticism, and how does this phenomenon impact modern society? The rejection of religious fanaticism in modern society can be explained by a combination of several factors. First, it is crucial to have a balanced and deep spiritual life, where attention is paid to the inner improvement of the individual rather than to external violence or aggression. In the view of the authors, when spiritual life is healthy, religious fanaticism is impossible; its emergence is tied to the distortion of that life. For example, one source notes:

"With a normal spiritual life, religious fanaticism is impossible. With its distortion—yes. That is why historical examples of religious fanaticism are found not only in other religions but also in many Christian communities that have deviated from the fullness of the Orthodox Church." (source: 1051_5251.txt)

Second, the presence of genuine moral and correct spiritual benchmarks is of great significance. This helps one distinguish true spiritual values from dogmatic and rigid interpretations that can lead to fanaticism. As stated in one of the texts:

"In sects, where there can be no talk of proper spiritual life, the environment is most conducive to fanaticism. Only the right spiritual benchmarks and a proper spiritual life can protect an individual from fanaticism." (source: 907_4533.txt)

Furthermore, quality education plays a major role by fostering critical thinking and a thoughtful attitude toward religious doctrines. This not only prevents the spread of fanatical ideas but also creates a fertile ground for healthy discussions within society. As mentioned:

"An important aspect of combating fanaticism is the quality of public education, as confirmed by the successful experiences of higher educational institutions." (source: 1228_6136.txt)

The rejection of fanaticism significantly impacts modern society. Fanaticism, based on rigid and often violent ideologies, breaks social bonds and fosters an atmosphere of fear and intolerance. Outbreaks of fanaticism lead to serious social consequences by undermining trust among people and intensifying polarization. For example, it is described that:

"Fanaticism... breaks all connections in society—it has enormous destructive power that undermines the fabric of society." (source: 1227_6134.txt)

It is also noted that an atmosphere in which fanatical sentiments are supported not only through violence but also via mass media fosters a social environment dominated by hatred and intolerance:

"A fanatic, or rather one infected with the bacillus of fanaticism... fights against culture, creating not only a charged atmosphere of fear, intolerance, and heresy around himself but also permeating the broader public sphere." (source: 1227_6134.txt)

Thus, the rejection of religious fanaticism is driven by both the inner work on one’s spiritual life and moral guidelines, as well as by external factors—education and critical reflection on traditional values. These measures help reduce the influence of extremist ideas and contribute to forming a society where mutual respect and openness to dialogue prevail.



Read More










Psalm 34: A Timeless Shield of Divine Protection


Psalm 34 stands as an undeniable symbol of divine protection and spiritual fortification for countless believers in the face of dangers. Since the dawn of faith, this psalm has served as a cornerstone for reaching out to the Higher Power, providing assurance and support in moments of both physical and spiritual threat. It carries a potent charge of prayerful energy, with each word directed toward seeking protection from enemies—both visible and invisible. The image of David, sincerely calling upon God for help, becomes an example for modern believers, demonstrating that even in the most challenging moments we can rely on divine care. By appealing to God for intercession, believers participate in an ancient yet eternal dialogue with higher forces, firmly believing that no trial is insurmountable when higher protection is on our side. This text is not merely a prayer but a symbol of confidence and spiritual strength, capable of inspiring and guiding every step on the path to liberation from evil and negativity.

How is Psalm 34 Used as a Method of Protection Against Enemies and What Significance Does This Practice Hold for Believers?

Psalm 34 is regarded by believers as a powerful protective prayer through which they ask God to intervene and deliver them from enemies on both a physical and spiritual level. Not only does this psalm call upon divine care, but it also becomes a striking "weapon" against both visible and invisible threats.

It is noted that this psalm is presented as a diligent prayer of intercession:
"This psalm represents a diligent prayer to God for intercession and deliverance from enemies. Jesus Christ pointed to the words of this psalm as a prophecy concerning baseless hatred towards Him by the Jews (...) This psalm is useful to read in the face of the onslaught of evil thoughts. Herein is the prayer of every faithful person against both visible and invisible offenders (Afanasy, Studit)." (source: 1475_7372.txt)

Furthermore, the text of the psalm contains appeals addressed to God asking for protection:
"1 Judge, O Lord, those who oppress me; overcome those who contend with me. Take up shield and armor, and arise to help me. Draw out the sword, and bring to an end the resistance of those pursuing me. Say to my soul: 'I am your salvation.'" (source: 1365_6824.txt)

These lines underline the practical aspect of using the psalm: it is through such appeals that believers direct their prayers to God, asking for protection from malevolent forces. Thus, Psalm 34 serves not only as a means of expressing despair in the face of danger but also as a way of gaining the confidence that, during trials and threats, God supports and protects the righteous.

Moreover, it is emphasized that David’s cry to God became an exemplar for subsequent generations:
"David's cry to God for help is widespread among believers, as a means of confronting both internal and external threats. The psalm is used against visible and invisible enemies, as a prayer weapon that guards against all forms of evil." (source: 1475_7372.txt)

For believers, this practice has profound significance: it strengthens the faith that, in any trial, God's help is near and allows them to see unforeseen dangers not as an end but as an opportunity to reaffirm God’s faithfulness and protection.

Supporting citation(s):
"This psalm represents a diligent prayer to God for intercession and deliverance from enemies. Jesus Christ pointed to the words of this psalm as a prophecy concerning baseless hatred towards Him by the Jews (...) This psalm is useful to read in the face of the onslaught of evil thoughts. Herein is the prayer of every faithful person against both visible and invisible offenders (Afanasy, Studit)." (source: 1475_7372.txt)

"1 Judge, O Lord, those who oppress me; overcome those who contend with me. Take up shield and armor, and arise to help me. Draw out the sword, and bring to an end the resistance of those pursuing me. Say to my soul: 'I am your salvation.'" (source: 1365_6824.txt)

"David's cry to God for help is widespread among believers, as a means of confronting both internal and external threats. The psalm is used against visible and invisible enemies, as a prayer weapon that guards against all forms of evil." (source: 1475_7372.txt)



Read More










True Spiritual Guidance: Learning from Exemplary Humility


In the modern world, many people strive to share their views, driven by the impulses of the soul and personal convictions. However, true mentorship requires far more than just a desire to instruct others—it is founded on profound experience, humility, and the authentic example of past spiritual leaders. While many eminent minds, philosophers, and religious thinkers attempted to attract followers through aggressive dissemination of their ideas, this striving often arose not from spiritual maturity but from personal ambition and insufficiently considered inner impulses.

The central idea is that genuine spiritual guidance is achieved not by imposing one’s ideas but by following the example of the holy apostles and ancient church fathers, who selflessly demonstrated a life-path marked by true humility and conscious dedication. Such an approach helps avoid the temptation to become a teacher without adequate experience and spiritual maturity, which in essence can lead both to one’s own downfall and to others misinterpreting the truth. The call for caution in choosing the path of mentorship serves as a reminder to always remain aware of the true purpose of spiritual guidance.

Ultimately, true wisdom lies in learning from those who have overcome many trials and in building one’s life on deep spiritual experience and humility. Only this approach can ensure not only personal development but also a solid, genuine influence on others, helping to avoid the lure of easy yet deceptive paths to spiritual self-expression.

Why, according to the text, do some people consider themselves entitled to teach others, and upon what should true spiritual guidance be based?

The text explains that many people strive to teach others, motivated by inner impulses that may arise from a desire to share their intellectual or spiritual views. The author notes that “all individuals who are even slightly outstanding in intellect have always striven to teach and to direct everyone towards their own fabrications; all philosophers, religious thinkers, and heretics have endeavored to vigorously propagate their heresies.” This indicates that the desire to teach others is driven not so much by genuine spiritual maturity as by personal ambition and even unblessed motivations, which are implied to be distorted by inner passions.

At the same time, true spiritual guidance should not be based on such impulses but on the example set by the holy apostles and church fathers, who, through their life experience and humility, showed the way to others. The author cites the teaching of the Apostle James, warning: “Do not have many teachers, my brethren, leading, as it were, to a greater condemnation,” meaning that an excessive desire to become a teacher without the necessary experience and spiritual grounding is dangerous for the soul.

Thus, according to the text, some people believe they are entitled to teach others due to inner impulses and motives. However, true spiritual leadership should be based on emulating the example of the holy apostles and church fathers—drawing upon spiritual experience, humility, and conscientious obedience, which safeguard a person from falling and from being led astray.

Supporting citation(s):
"All individuals who are even slightly outstanding in intellect have always striven to teach and to direct everyone towards their own fabrications; all philosophers, religious thinkers, and heretics have endeavored to vigorously propagate their heresies; every religious sect wishes to involve everyone possible in their nets. ... Do not have many teachers, my brethren, leading, as it were, to a greater condemnation, says the Apostle James" (source: 1446_7226.txt)



Read More