The phrase "The eye of God is not working" can be interpreted as an ironic or critical remark towards the traditional notion of God as a constant, all-seeing overseer who watches over and adjusts the course of history.

Divine Oversight Under Scrutiny

The phrase "The eye of God is not working" can be interpreted as an ironic or critical remark towards the traditional notion of God as a constant, all-seeing overseer who watches over and adjusts the course of history. This expression suggests that divine supervision, if it exists, does not operate as we expect: mishaps, disasters, and injustices in the world imply that the "eye of God" does not "work" in the full sense of the term, meaning it does not exert a direct influence on events.

From this perspective, the statement questions the idea that God invariably intervenes in human lives or ensures justice through omniscience.

Much like Darwin in his work left the unresolved question of how light is actually perceived at the cellular level—"But the question remains: how do we actually see?

Although Darwin managed to convince much of the world that the modern eye could have gradually evolved from a simpler structure, he did not even attempt to explain how the simple light-sensitive spot, which served as his starting point, actually worked. In discussing the eye, Darwin avoided this question, stating: 'The way in which the nerve becomes sensitive to light hardly concerns us any more than the origin of life itself'…" (source: link txt)—so too the expression "The eye of God is not working" may emphasize that even divine observation proves as difficult to explain as the mechanisms of the material world.

Thus, within the context of religious criticism or historical interpretation, this expression can be used to challenge the unconditional belief in constant divine intervention and observation of the world. It prompts us to ponder whether the concept of an all-seeing God is merely a symbolic construct that does not reflect empirically observable reality.