The assertion that the Lord can “grow back a brain” can be understood as a figurative expression that emphasizes the possibility of divine intervention in the nature of the human mind.

Divine Transformation of the Mind

The assertion that the Lord can “grow back a brain” can be understood as a figurative expression that emphasizes the possibility of divine intervention in the nature of the human mind. It is not so much a concrete testimony to the physical regeneration of neurons as it is an indication that God is capable of endowing a person with abilities that surpass his natural physical limitations. In other words, if the brain is regarded merely as an instrument for the expression of the mind or spirit, then the Lord, possessing a higher kind of energy, can “upgrade” this instrument, providing a person with new, more advanced forms of cognition and perception.

This idea is closely related to the dualistic viewpoint, according to which the brain and the spirit (or mind) are two interconnected yet fundamentally distinct entities. This perspective is illustrated by the following statement:
“All of the above can be summed up in these words: the brain is a highly complex apparatus, but it operates in conjunction with the mind, which has its own energy. Of course, the brain is an instrument of thought, but in itself the instrument cannot play.” (source: link txt)

This passage emphasizes that the brain is not the source of consciousness; rather, it serves as an intermediary through which something more substantial is expressed. Thus, the statement about the possibility to “grow back a brain” can be interpreted as a metaphor for the Lord’s ability not only to influence our physical body but also to significantly enhance or restore the spiritual and intellectual essence, regardless of the limitations predetermined by nature.

This idea raises several important theological and philosophical questions.

The first concerns the relationship between the physical and the spiritual: can the physical substrate of the brain completely determine the level of human consciousness, or is there something more that exists beyond the material?

The second question pertains to the nature of divine intervention: if the Lord is capable of “growing back a brain,” how profoundly can He affect a person’s destiny and intellectual development? In this context, the assertion challenges materialistic views on evolution and personal development, as humorously illustrated in the following excerpt:
“Of course, if we did not descend from God but from monkeys, then what do we have left? Only to grow a tail and jump. Like most of humanity: just heehee, ha ha. What do people do? Eat, drink, and indulge in pleasure; that’s life: here they sinned a bit, there they sinned, there they messed up, here they got into trouble, here they disfigured, there they broke something.” (source: link txt)

In this passage, the author mocks reductionist approaches that reduce the human essence to a mere biological mechanism, arguing instead that a person’s true calling, according to the dualistic view, is far deeper.

Thus, the expression “the Lord can grow back a brain” symbolically suggests the possibility of transforming a person through divine energy and wisdom. It challenges the limitations of a materialistic approach to understanding the human mind and underscores that true personal development is linked not only to the physical growth of the brain but also to the spiritual refinement.