God's Unseen Transcendence: Interpreting Divine Mystery
Answering this question requires an understanding that the claim that no one has seen God is not proof of His non-existence, but rather reflects the unique nature of God as presented in theological texts. As seen in one excerpt, the emphasis is not on the non-existence of God, but on the fact that His essence is inaccessible to human perception:“No one has ever seen God, nor can any see Him” (source: link txt).In this context, the Apostle Paul indicates that God is something that transcends physical reality and earthly senses. Another text underscores that even Moses, to whom God appeared, saw only a manifestation or echo of Divinity, and not His very essence:“God cannot be seen. Even Moses, as is known, saw only how God appeared to him... he did not see the essence, he did not see God Himself as such” (source: link txt).From these quotes, it follows that the argument “no evidence of God’s appearance” is used not to prove His non-existence, but to emphasize the fundamental unknowability of His essence. In other words, the fact that God remains invisible in the usual sense serves as a sign of His transcendence and inaccessibility to ordinary human experience, rather than a proof of His absence.Thus, to claim that God does not exist solely because no one has seen Him disregards the traditional theological view that God’s invisibility is a quality dictated by His supernatural nature, not an empirical demonstration of His nonexistence.In summary: the assertion of God’s invisibility is not an argument against His existence; it reflects the understanding that God’s true essence is beyond the scope of human material perception.Supporting citation(s):“No one has ever seen God, nor can any see Him” (source: link txt) “God cannot be seen. Even Moses, as is known, saw only how God appeared to him... he did not see the essence, he did not see God Himself as such” (source: link txt)