Beyond Labels: Rethinking Attitudes Toward Satanism
The world is not divided into black and white, especially when it comes to worldviews and personal beliefs. On one hand, certain sources portray Satanism as a philosophy based on the belief in the inherent selfishness and cruelty of human nature. On the other hand, this philosophy is seen as a perspective that accepts a person as they are and offers a reinterpretation of traditional moral norms. This dual approach suggests that changing one’s attitude towards a person should not be based solely on the label of their religious beliefs. It is far more important to evaluate their actual actions, life principles, and the degree to which their views influence their behavior and relationships with others. If the philosophy someone adheres to is predominantly theoretical and does not evidently harm others, it is worth reconsidering any preconceptions. Conversely, if their actions confirm negative traits, rejection may be justified. Ultimately, understanding a person requires analyzing their behavior rather than blindly following conceptual definitions. Such an approach helps to maintain objectivity in judgments and paves the way for a deeper understanding of the diverse range of human perspectives.
How should one change their attitude towards a person if it turns out they follow Satanism?Based on the materials presented, no specific instructions are given on how to change one’s attitude toward someone who follows Satanism. However, several important ideas for consideration can be derived. For instance, one source emphasizes that according to LaVey, Satanism represents an “unabashedly selfish, ruthless philosophy” based on the belief that humans are inherently selfish and cruel (source: link txt). This description highlights that adherence to this ideology implies a certain worldview. Meanwhile, another excerpt underscores that Satanism is a religion that accepts individuals as they are, offering a logical rationale for transforming the notion of good and evil (source: link txt).From these ideas, one can conclude that changing one’s attitude towards a person should be based not so much on the label of their beliefs but on an analysis of their actual behavior, life principles, and their attitude toward others. If a person subscribes to these philosophical views, it is essential first to assess whether they exhibit aggression, cruelty, or other harmful behaviors toward others, or if their position remains purely theoretical. In other words, it is necessary to weigh whether their personal actions and values (independent of any ideological tint) align with your own principles, rather than making judgments based solely on the declared affiliation with a certain ideology.Thus, if it turns out that a person practices Satanism, it is suggested that one reassesses their attitude based on the individual’s behavior and personal convictions, rather than relying exclusively on the conceptual definitions of this ideology.Supporting citation(s):“‘Satanism is an unabashedly selfish, ruthless philosophy. It is based on the belief that human beings are, by nature, selfish and cruel, and that life is a process of natural selection according to Darwin…’” (source: link txt)“‘Satanism is the only religion known to the world that accepts a person as they truly are, and offers a logical rationale for transforming the bad into the good…’” (source: link txt)