Believers consciously attribute a specific name and image to God in order to establish a real and comprehensible dialogue between humanity and the Absolute.

Naming the Divine: Bridging the Infinite with the Personal

Believers consciously attribute a specific name and image to God in order to establish a real and comprehensible dialogue between humanity and the Absolute. This idea is based on the human mind's need to communicate with another subject—when we call our interlocutor by name, we come closer to them, making the conversation more personal. Such an approach helps people grasp that part of the divine that the human mind is capable of comprehending, even if the true essence of God remains infinite and unattainable.

In this concept of religious knowledge, every detail is significant—from the image to symbolic representations that do not merely confine the Divine, but serve as a bridge to it. Each religion, by forming its own conception of God, enables its followers to establish a unique dialogue with Him, through which they derive spiritual guidance and strength for personal growth. This energetic and dynamic approach underscores that faith is, above all, a living encounter with a Personality capable of transforming a person's life.

In the end, the desire to engage in dialogue with God through specific names and images not only makes the Absolute accessible to human consciousness, but also opens the way for deep inner communication, strengthening spiritual foundations and allowing each person to find their own understanding of the eternal and immeasurable.

Why do believers give God a specific name and form, thereby limiting His infinity?

Believers attribute a specific name and image to God not by chance: it is done to establish personal and tangible communication that is comprehensible to the human mind. Limiting the infinite Divine does not mean that the true essence of God is exhausted by a given form or name, but rather reflects a method by which people can draw closer to the Absolute. As it is stated in one source:

"But worshiping Him necessarily requires a specific conception of Him, requires His tangible image (conceptual, symbolic, iconographic ...). Therefore, in every religion there exists its own image of God, which defines not only its doctrinal and spiritual-moral teachings, but also the spiritual life of the believer. And so it is precisely this image that is the real God of that religion. In other words, each religion worships its own God." (source: link txt)

This approach derives from the natural human need to enter into dialogue with one's interlocutor. Another source explains that to establish communication it is necessary to address the interlocutor by name, which allows transitioning from an abstract representation to a personal encounter:

"Religious reality is revealed as a personalist reality. Not an impersonal and indifferent Something, not an ontologically self-overflowing Being, but a living Personality is addressed to man in the experience of Divine communion. This means that the methodology of religious knowledge itself must be built on the principles of dialogue. The first law of dialogue dictates: to enter into communication, it is necessary to address the interlocutor, call him by name, and turn to him." (source: link txt)

Thus, by giving God a specific name and form, believers do not so much limit His infinity as create a means through which they can approach Him, perceiving and experiencing that part of the Divine which the human mind can comprehend. This endows God with characteristics through which a personal, dialogical contact can be established, even though the truth of God remains infinite and inaccessible.