The contradiction between the government's call to "be fruitful and multiply" and simultaneous military mobilization creates noticeable demographic strain.

Mobilization's Demographic Paradox

The contradiction between the government's call to "be fruitful and multiply" and simultaneous military mobilization creates noticeable demographic strain. On one hand, the state emphasizes the need to increase the number of citizens, support families, and replenish the working-age population. On the other hand, mass mobilization forces a large portion of adults and the working population out of civilian life, which undermines the potential for reproduction and leads to significant socio-economic shifts. This is evident, for example, in the changing population structure: mobilization not only affects the military sphere but also results in the systematic redistribution of human and material resources, subsequently influencing birth and mortality rates.

Thus, when the active, childbearing-capable population is temporarily or permanently redirected for military needs, it negatively impacts the demographic situation. The growth of military forces, the loss of working-age citizens, and accompanying social upheavals deal a blow to the natural population increase, creating long-term challenges for maintaining demographic balance in the country.

Supporting citation(s):

"Mobilization, as a rule, not only implies a call to arms but also a systematic redistribution of human and material resources. In this context, demographic issues acquire new meaning: each mobilization leads to serious changes in the country's socio-economic structure, which inevitably affects birth and death rates." (source: link txt)

"The loss of adult and working-age men as a result of mobilization negatively impacts the demographic situation." (source: Latest message, no page)