When ancient empirical teachings of Buddha, Tsongkhapa, and Milarepa are subjected to logical systematization, their primal depth begins to lose the personal and transcendent experience that is so difficult to convey in words. In its attempt to give Buddhism a clear philosophical form, Lamaism falls into the trap of artificial intellectualization, whereby aspects that are truly beyond discourse become casualties of rationalization. This tendency contradicts the very nature of the Buddhist path, which has always relied on direct experience and inner transformation rather than on dry dogmas or systematized schemes. Historical context shows that the Tibetan traditions, still at the crossroads with shamanism, were influenced by preachers who asserted the nonexistence of God. Such an approach only deepened the contradictions and muddled spiritual development, leaving the immeasurable energy of psychic experience lost in conceptual frameworks. In the end, attempting to transform an empirical, living practice into a strict philosophical system inevitably leads to the distortion of the original essence, where every logical explanation becomes a barrier on the path to directly understanding truth.