In the world of traditional doctrines, where the designation of seven key sins is fundamental, contradictions and nuances in their interpretation have always existed. On one hand, all these sins carry a mortal threat to the soul, destroying its path to salvation; on the other, certain sins, such as suicide, occupy a unique position where repentance is not possible. The primary idea here is that no spiritual feats, no prayers of saints, nor the holiness of angels can compensate for the devastating power of these transgressions unless they are redeemed by true and profound repentance, accompanied by a sacrifice that symbolizes the redemption of the very essence of human error. Meanwhile, suicide, as one of the mortal sins, stands out with its inescapable status – it is the only act for which there is no path to forgiveness, underscoring its exceptional danger to the soul. This analogy reminds us that the spiritual legacy of teachings is never unequivocal, and each act has its own evaluation, degree of responsibility, and path to possible reconciliation with higher forces. Ultimately, the analysis of the doctrine shows how a fine line is drawn between the exalted danger of each sin and the specific measure for its redemption, leaving room for deep reflections on the nature of guilt and true redemption.