In the modern world, where decisions are often made under urgency, it is extremely important to remember the need for careful analysis of circumstances.

Reflecting Before Action: Delaying Urgent Decisions for Thorough Analy

In the modern world, where decisions are often made under urgency, it is extremely important to remember the need for careful analysis of circumstances. When key details remain unclear or the situation is changeable, it is wise to suspend decisions and wait for a moment when all aspects of the matter can be considered. This position is supported by the profound thoughts of renowned thinkers, who point out that issues related to morally significant property or responsibility for outcomes require time and a comprehensive approach. Instead of taking a hasty step, it is suggested to postpone illuminating disclosures and important decisions until there is an opportunity to fully evaluate every nuance. This strategy helps avoid unpredictable results and ensures fairness, which is the cornerstone of both ethics and practical wisdom. In conclusion, it is worth noting that the willingness to wait for a better time to make life-altering decisions is not only a manifestation of caution but also a sign of deep understanding of the circumstances, contributing to more well-founded and just decisions in the future.

What life decisions or actions should be postponed until better times, and on what basis can such advice be given?

In some cases, it is advisable to delay decisions whose outcomes depend on a complete assessment of circumstances that are currently incomplete or changeable. For example, Montalt, in one of his discourses, notes that revelations connected to ill-gotten property require deeper analysis and cannot be executed “in a few words.” He concludes:
"These funds must not be returned, but distributed to the poor. ... But since such matters cannot be accomplished in a few words, Montalt decided to postpone these kinds of revelations until better times." (source: link txt)

Furthermore, there is the opinion that decisions related to accountability for consequences (for example, the decision regarding leniency) should be postponed until a time when it becomes possible to consider all aspects of the matter:
"You think that responsibility for the consequences rests on the Church, if one prevents just retribution? Madness! ... Therefore, the decision regarding leniency should be postponed until better times, when there is an opportunity to take all circumstances into account." (source: unknown)

Thus, the advice to postpone certain actions until better times is based on the fact that important moral and practical decisions require a comprehensive approach and a full understanding of the situation at hand. If circumstances remain uncertain or volatile, deciding too hastily may lead to unforeseen consequences. It is precisely for this reason that such postponement may serve as a basis for waiting for a more favorable time, when all aspects have been adequately considered and the decision is truly justified.

Supporting citation(s):
"These funds must not be returned, but distributed to the poor. ... Montalt decided to postpone these kinds of revelations until better times." (source: link txt)
"You think that responsibility for the consequences rests on the Church, ... therefore, the decision regarding leniency should be postponed until better times, when there is an opportunity to take all circumstances into account." (source: unknown)