Each of us possesses a unique inner world that remains secret, much like an ancient cosmos that is not subject to simple logical analysis.

Unlocking the Hidden Cosmos: The Art of Understanding Another's Inner

Each of us possesses a unique inner world that remains secret, much like an ancient cosmos that is not subject to simple logical analysis. We never gain direct access to another person’s private space—all our contact is based on indirect signals: looks, gestures, intonations, and movements. From the very first moments of communication, we learn to read the invisible signs of the soul, as if mastering a new language in which every nonverbal element enriches our understanding of human emotions. This art of empathy requires not only reason but also true emotional responsiveness, allowing us to feel another’s experiences, making our interactions truly profound and meaningful. Ultimately, the realization that a person’s inner universe remains partially hidden even from themselves pushes us to develop empathy and a continual striving to learn to “read” others not only with the mind but, above all, with the heart.

Is it truly possible to understand another person’s inner world, and what might impede this process?

Understanding another person’s inner world is a complex and, in some sense, limited process because we do not have direct access to their soul. The inner world of each of us exists independently and objectively; however, we can learn about it only through indirect manifestations—gestures, intonations, facial expressions, and actions. As stated in one of the sources:

"In another person’s inner world exists real and independent of us, but we cannot perceive it directly—we cannot see it, hear it, and it is inaccessible to instruments. We learn about it only by indirect signs, by the way this other person expresses themselves—with a glance, a word, an action, facial expressions, the movement of a hand and body. These movements and expressions by themselves speak nothing—we spend our whole lives learning how to read them, learning to understand another’s soul. It is just like learning to read: the marks on the paper do not speak by themselves, but we learn to understand the hidden meaning behind them, and quite accurately. However, we learn to read a book with the mind, but learning to “read” a person by their words, glances, intonations, and gestures can only be acquired through feeling."
(source: link txt)

Thus, one of the main obstacles to truly understanding another is the inability to directly perceive their inner world, forcing us to rely on empirical experience accumulated through long-term interactions and attention to nonverbal signals.

Another important aspect is that complete understanding requires the ability to empathize—that is, to feel the same emotions as the speaker. In another quoted fragment, it is emphasized:

"To understand another person means to feel the same as they are experiencing at that moment, to respond to their feeling. Here is one of the most beautiful words in our language: responsive. Listen to it: responsive... capable of responding... easily responsive... always ready to respond... If there were a 'school of feelings,' then the first subject, the first lesson, would be a lesson in responsiveness. We learn to feel by resonating with the feelings of others. Despite their mysterious nature, there is no miracle, nothing magical or supernatural in feelings. They are simply incomprehensible to the mind, but can be grasped with the heart."
(source: link txt)

This quote highlights the necessity of openness and emotional responsiveness, as well as emphasizing that the inability to truly empathize can be a significant barrier to comprehending another’s deeper world.

Moreover, the inner world of a person, by its very nature, is unique and multifaceted. It represents a complex cosmos that does not always yield easily to simple analysis or logical perception, because:

"The inner world of a person is indeed their personality. This is why the inner world, the inner cosmos, is completely different from the external: the material world, taken as a whole, has no necessity, no purpose."
(source: link txt)

This statement reminds us that attempts to objectively evaluate or fully understand another person are limited by the nature of their inner experience, which often remains partially hidden even from themselves.

Thus, it can be concluded that truly understanding another person’s inner world is only possible to a limited extent and always conditionally, as our perception is confined to external manifestations and our capacity for empathy. The primary obstacles are the inability to directly perceive someone’s inner realm, the complexity of reading nonverbal signals, and the need for genuine emotional responsiveness, which is not always easy to develop.

Supporting citation(s):
"In another person’s inner world exists real and independent of us, but we cannot perceive it directly—we cannot see it, hear it, and it is inaccessible to instruments. We learn about it only by indirect signs, by the way this other person expresses themselves—with a glance, a word, an action, facial expressions, the movement of a hand and body. These movements and expressions by themselves speak nothing—we spend our whole lives learning how to read them, learning to understand another’s soul. It is just like learning to read: the marks on the paper do not speak by themselves, but we learn to understand the hidden meaning behind them, and quite accurately. However, we learn to read a book with the mind, but learning to “read” a person by their words, glances, intonations, and gestures can only be acquired through feeling." (source: link txt)

"To understand another person means to feel the same as they are experiencing at that moment, to respond to their feeling. Here is one of the most beautiful words in our language: responsive. Listen to it: responsive... capable of responding... easily responsive... always ready to respond... If there were a 'school of feelings,' then the first subject, the first lesson, would be a lesson in responsiveness. We learn to feel by resonating with the feelings of others. Despite their mysterious nature, there is no miracle, nothing magical or supernatural in feelings. They are simply incomprehensible to the mind, but can be grasped with the heart." (source: link txt)

"The inner world of a person is indeed their personality. This is why the inner world, the inner cosmos, is completely different from the external: the material world, taken as a whole, has no necessity, no purpose." (source: link txt)