The changes that harbor the power of genuine transformation often require deep inner reflection and the courage to reconsider one’s own beliefs.

From Brutality to Pacifism: A Journey of Historical Insight

The changes that harbor the power of genuine transformation often require deep inner reflection and the courage to reconsider one’s own beliefs. David Gir, having abandoned brutal methods of governance, began a path toward pacifism by realizing that aggressive strategies do not lead to the desired outcomes but only exacerbate problems. This turning point was the result of an intensive analysis of both his own ideology and historical processes. The rejection of dogmatism and a close look at the past allowed him to see that understanding complex modern social, political, and cultural phenomena requires taking into account extended stages of historical development. Such an analytical approach revealed new horizons where sustainable change could come through methodical and peaceful transformation of society. The outcome of this rethinking was the conviction that rejecting violence can provide real progress, opening the way for harmonious changes and a future where historical lessons become a reliable foundation for new ideas.

What reasons could have prompted David Gir, after embodying the image of a bloody ruler, to choose the path of pacifism?

Based on the available data, it can be assumed that David Gir arrived at the idea of pacifism through deep intellectual transformation and a rethinking of his previous methods of governance. First and foremost, he began to doubt the effectiveness of an aggressive, bloody approach, as he realized that “slogans, utopias, political myths – all this leads nowhere, all this cannot change the world and cannot bring about the results he dreamed of.” It was precisely this shift in worldview, as evidenced by the document excerpt, that became a turning point in his life, prompting him to abandon his former methods and to seek ways capable of ensuring gradual, sustainable change.

Furthermore, his transition to studying historical processes, particularly through acquainting himself with the works of German medievalists, allowed him to analyze the origins of modern political, social, cultural, and economic processes more deeply. This analytical approach helped him see that, to understand and alter the situation, it is necessary to consider long historical stages and traditional models—a notion that contradicted the nature of a dogmatic, bloody ruler. Perhaps it was precisely the realization of the complexity and multifaceted character of historical development that inspired him to choose a path based on the principles of pacifism, where the abandonment of violence might appear more effective in achieving his ideals.

Supporting citation(s):
"And suddenly he, with his mighty and keen intellect, already back then at the turn of the century, understood that slogans, utopias, political myths — all this leads nowhere, all this cannot change the world and cannot bring about the results he dreamed of. He familiarized himself with the works of German historians, mainly medievalists, specialists in the Middle Ages. He became interested in this epoch because he had already realized that understanding today's situation could only be achieved by tracing all the stages of its emergence. The European situation, like the Russian one, has its roots in medieval models — political, social, cultural, and even economic. And, after returning from exile to St. Petersburg, he enrolled in the Faculty of History." (source: link txt)