Modern science shatters old notions of matter as an immutable substance, unveiling a whole world of dynamic processes and interactions.

Dynamic Matter: Redefining the Electron and Its Role

Modern science shatters old notions of matter as an immutable substance, unveiling a whole world of dynamic processes and interactions. Today, electrons are seen not as unchanging “building blocks” but as carriers of electrical forces, whose fundamental properties—charge and mass—are determined by perpetually changing dynamic laws. In contrast to atoms—complex structures composed of electrons, protons, and neutrons—the elementary electron displays an unchanging essence, remaining a constant nucleus of electrical activity even while adhering to the strict rules of quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle.

This paradigm shift reflects the evolution of our views on matter, where the idea emerges that a thing is not static but the result of interactions among fundamental forces. Moving away from the old understanding of substance as a solid entity allows us to perceive the nature of matter through the lens of continuous creative interactions, reminiscent of Leibniz’s philosophy of a dynamic world. This perspective underscores that even the most elementary particles, such as electrons, play a decisive role in determining the structure and behavior of the universe, transforming into a vibrant fabric where dynamics are the chief architects of reality.

Thus, the shift from traditional views to a new perspective of matter as dynamic activity not only renews our understanding of nature but also inspires the quest for new answers regarding the laws governing the world. This fresh interpretation of fundamental phenomena stimulates further experiments and research, emphasizing that the truth in science is always open and multifaceted.

Is it possible to compare the inexhaustibility of an electron with that of an atom, and what does this say about the nature of matter in modern science?

Modern science is moving away from the notion of matter as an unalterable substance and is instead viewing it as dynamic activity manifested through fundamental forces and interactions. In this context, electrons are not seen as the traditional “building blocks” of matter but as carriers of electrical forces, whose properties are shaped by dynamic processes.

The comparison between atoms and electrons regarding inexhaustibility highlights the difference in their roles: atoms, as composite structures, are aggregates where electrons, protons, and neutrons combine according to specific laws, whereas electrons, as elementary particles, demonstrate the constancy of their charge and mass even though they are subject to the laws of quantum mechanics and the uncertainty principle. Thus, the invariability or “inexhaustibility” of the electron suggests that fundamental particles are manifestations of dynamic processes rather than indestructible substances.

This belief is encapsulated in the following reflection:
"The electron is not a tangible, nor is it a fictitious center of all definitions of matter, a true building block of the cosmos. It is the center of active electrical forces, and its mass is explained as a result, as a derivative of its electrical nature. In this process, mass turns out to be a variable quantity, and Newton’s laws, upon which mechanics is built, are only approximately valid at low speeds of movement." (source: link txt)

In parallel, views on the nature of matter have evolved from the notion of a solid substance to understanding it as dynamic activity:
"At the foundation of what was called matter, substance, lie immaterial primary elements. I categorically assert that the concept of substance has played its role in physics. Physics must liberate itself from the conceived substance. Matter is now understood not as a substance, but as dynamic activity, as the classical philosopher of a dynamic conception of the world, Leibniz, understood it." (source: link txt)

Thus, when comparing an atom with an electron, one can say that the atom, as a structure, exhibits a mutable, composite nature, whereas the electron, remaining elementary, demonstrates its “inexhaustibility” through the constancy of its fundamental properties. This underscores that the foundation of matter in modern physics is not rooted in static, exhaustible elements but in dynamically emerging and interacting processes, where even elementary particles like electrons play a key role in determining the structure and behavior of matter.

Supporting citation(s):
"The electron is not a tangible, nor is it a fictitious center of all definitions of matter, a true building block of the cosmos. It is the center of active electrical forces, and its mass is explained as a result, as a derivative of its electrical nature. In this process, mass turns out to be a variable quantity, and Newton’s laws, upon which mechanics is built, are only approximately valid at low speeds of movement." (source: link txt)

"At the foundation of what was called matter, substance, lie immaterial primary elements. I categorically assert that the concept of substance has played its role in physics. Physics must liberate itself from the conceived substance. Matter is now understood not as a substance, but as dynamic activity, as the classical philosopher of a dynamic conception of the world, Leibniz, understood it." (source: link txt)