Modern cosmology offers a breathtaking vision of the beginning of everything: imagine that the Universe emerged from a point with an infinitely compressed volume that began expanding rapidly.

Unraveling the Cosmic Enigma: Big Bang and the Origins of Existence

Modern cosmology offers a breathtaking vision of the beginning of everything: imagine that the Universe emerged from a point with an infinitely compressed volume that began expanding rapidly. This theory, known as the Big Bang model, explains the appearance of all matter as the result of a purely natural process without the intervention of supernatural forces. If one disregards the hypothesis of divine creation, then one is left to assume that such an astonishing phenomenon fits exclusively within the framework of known natural laws.

Yet, therein lies one of the primary mysteries: how could the initial state capable of triggering such a cosmic mechanism arise if we rely solely on current laws of physics?

The problem is that the Big Bang model does not provide a complete and experimentally verified account of the moment when this “cosmic explosion” occurred. Numerous unanswered questions remain regarding where the conditions necessary for the expansion originated and how, possibly, the usual laws of matter were broken down during the very earliest period.

Thus, whether we view the Big Bang theory as a remarkable natural occurrence or as part of a global enigma, it continues to spark fervent debates and stimulate scientific research. This dynamic picture of the Universe’s origin not only intrigues us but also pushes us toward new discoveries in understanding the fundamental processes underlying existence.

If Allah does not exist, how does the Big Bang theory explain the origin of the Universe? The Big Bang theory describes the emergence of the Universe as a process in which everything began from a point of infinitely small volume, compressed to zero, after which this point started expanding. According to this model, if it is assumed that Allah (or, in other words, God) does not exist, the explanation is based entirely on a natural process: from an extremely compressed state, the Universe—acting like a “seed”—began its expansion, and from that moment on, processes of matter formation can be observed.

However, the main problem with this approach is that it does not establish a clear cause-and-effect relationship at the moment the expansion began. As noted in one source, “How can the Big Bang theory explain the origin of the Universe without the intervention of Allah? The Big Bang theory asserts that the Universe began its journey from a point of infinitely small volume, compressed to zero, and continues to expand. Experimental verification here is impossible. From a logical standpoint, the Big Bang theory would inspire much greater confidence than a hypothesis of dispersal from an intermediary point, only under one condition: if the causes of the explosion and the course of its progression perfectly fit within the current laws of nature.” (source: 1898_9487.txt)

It is also noted that if the explanation of the Universe’s origin excludes the intervention of any supernatural force, then all the initial processes must be entirely consistent with the known laws of nature. However, according to some studies, the Big Bang theory “does not provide such clarity,” meaning that questions remain about where the conditions necessary for the start of expansion came from, and how the usual course of natural laws might have been disrupted in the very initial stage (source: 1898_9487.txt).

Thus, from the perspective of the Big Bang theory, in the absence of Allah, the origin of the Universe is interpreted as the result of natural expansion from an extremely compressed state. However, this model faces criticism due to the lack of a fully developed and experimentally confirmed scheme of the causes of this primordial state, leaving the question of the first cause open and debatable.

Supporting citation(s):
"How can the Big Bang theory explain the origin of the Universe without the intervention of Allah? The Big Bang theory asserts that the Universe began its journey from a point of infinitely small volume, compressed to zero, and continues to expand. Experimental verification here is impossible. From a logical standpoint, the Big Bang theory would inspire much greater confidence than a hypothesis of dispersal from an intermediary point, only under one condition: if the causes of the explosion and the course of its progression perfectly fit within the current laws of nature." (source: 1898_9487.txt)

"In this case, we would have much greater reason to believe in an explanation of the facts that does not require the violation of the laws known to us. But the Big Bang theory does not provide such clarity at all." (source: 1898_9487.txt)