In the modern world, there is a prominent trend toward softening complex religious ideas by making them as understandable and accessible to rational perception as possible.

Simplifying Spiritual Depth in the Modern Era

In the modern world, there is a prominent trend toward softening complex religious ideas by making them as understandable and accessible to rational perception as possible. Today’s intellectual approach encourages the transformation of deep and multifaceted spiritual truths into simplified concepts that resonate with our sensory experience. The human mind, limited by concrete experiences, strives to systematize and reduce mystical complexity into forms that are clearer and more logically structured. At the same time, a growing desire to lessen personal moral demands paves the way for seeking easier paths to spiritual salvation—a tendency often seen within various sectarian and rationalist movements. Although these simplified forms seem attractive to contemporary consciousness, they can sometimes lose the rich, original depth inherent in traditional religious teachings. In the constant quest to balance reason and faith, it is crucial to remember that true spiritual understanding requires preserving historical wisdom while harmonizing it with a rational worldview.

Does the Trend Toward Simplification Reflect Modern Thinking?

It can be argued that the tendency to simplify religious teaching is indeed observed as we move closer to modernity. Contemporary thought increasingly aims to diminish the complexity of theological concepts by translating them into forms that are convenient for rational understanding and, often, practical application. This development is largely due to an intellectual approach where the human mind, constrained by sensory experience, attempts to substitute deep and multifaceted spiritual truths with simplified, “clearly articulated” categorical representations.

For instance, one source notes:
"Human earthly intellect, limited by sensory experience, bound to abstract logical concepts and to the temporal scheme of causal explanation, becomes the criterion of religious truth. The categories of the mind turn into the measure of religious contemplation. The mind, a tool of earthly necessity, brings necessary simplification and conditional detachment to all aspects of life, favoring the flat clarity of any depth and complexity, mechanically 'stylizing' the organic mystery of life. And so, the minion of base utility and insulting simplicity ends up as the guardian and censor of divine revelation..."
(source: link txt)

This simplification is further intensified by the desire to lower the demands for profound moral effort, as seen in the pursuit of “easier” paths to salvation. In this regard, the idea of salvation without the necessity of a strenuous quest finds expression in various sectarian and rationalist movements:
"The idea of 'easier' salvation lies at the core of all sects, both rationalist and mystical. The ordeal is too heavy: can’t it be replaced by something else? ..."
(source: link txt)

Thus, the simplification of religious teaching is influenced by two main trends: the intensification of intellectualism and rationalism—where deep mystical and spiritual truths are replaced with clear and accessible concepts—and the drive to reduce the demands on personal spiritual endeavor. Both trends contribute to the reduction of a complex and layered tradition to simpler forms that appeal to modern consciousness, albeit at the cost of some of the original depth of the teaching.

Supporting citation(s):
"Human earthly intellect, limited by sensory experience, bound to abstract logical concepts... introduces the necessary simplification into all aspects of life..." (source: link txt)
"The idea of 'easier' salvation lies at the core of all sects, both rationalist and mystical. The ordeal is too heavy: can’t it be replaced by something else?..." (source: link txt)