The Unconscious Labyrinth of Memory

Memory is not merely an archive of exact facts, but rather a complex, active process in which our internal beliefs and emotional state play a role. In this dynamic labyrinth, even details related to false assertions undergo their own transformation when information enters the depths of our subconscious. Imagine how sometimes a switch occurs as unseen forces of the unconscious actively rework memories, turning them into more “acceptable” versions of reality. Even if information is continuously transmitted, details that do not conform to our expectations gradually vanish, leaving behind only a processed image of events. This is why our memory can present distorted versions of facts when significant events are perceived through the prism of emotional and moral biases. Such dynamics remind us that true perception of reality is often determined not by what we consciously remember, but by what remains beyond our control. This mysterious force of unconscious memory opens our eyes to how our inner world shapes our perception of reality, urging us to always look deeper and to question the superficial.

How does memory affect the ability to remember who lied and what, and why do we sometimes lose these details?
Memory here appears not as an infallible archive of facts, but as an active process influenced by our internal beliefs and emotional state. In particular, the ability to remember details associated with lies or false assertions is determined by how information is encoded into our unconscious perception.

As noted in one fragment, “during hypnosis this ability is enhanced… Thus, both types of paramnesia, considered from this perspective, are examples not of false, but actual, unconscious memory” (source: link ). This emphasizes that there exists a kind of memory that operates without our conscious control. It is within this framework of unconscious memorization that distorted or simplified versions of events can emerge, for example, regarding who lied and about what. In other words, when data enter our memory without full consciousness, we may not retain all the details, but only their reworked, more “acceptable” versions.

Moreover, the provided materials show that even when information is transmitted over a long period, details can “evaporate from consciousness” due to an emotional or moral dissonance with our internal convictions. As it is said: “although the Lord spoke for three years to His disciples that He should be captured... — but this faded from their consciousness. And something similar happens with us as well” (source: link ). This suggests that we tend to involuntarily “forget” or distort those elements of information that conflict with our expectations or internal beliefs.

Thus, memory affects the ability to recall who lied and what through two mechanisms. On one hand, unconscious processes may record events; on the other, details that do not align with our notions or are too unpleasant may gradually fade or be reprocessed. This explains why sometimes we are unable to accurately reconstruct facts, remembering them only in a distorted form.