Divine Duality: Uniting Eternal Being and Creative Action

Answering profound questions about the essence of Divinity, we encounter two astonishing yet inseparably linked aspects. In one aspect, God appears as an immutable and absolute reality—a self-existent being beyond our full comprehension. This image emphasizes His eternality, steadfastness, and self-sufficiency, with each feature speaking of an infinite inner world that is not subject to the changes of time.

On the other hand, the dynamic conception of God reveals Him as a living force that continuously manifests in the process of creation and existence. Here, the emphasis shifts to the action itself—the energy of creative activity through which that which is unchanging is joined to the eternal flow of being. This understanding presents an image of God who not only simply is but also actively creates, reminding us that the world never becomes stagnant and is always full of driving energy.

Such a union of static and dynamic creates a holistic and inspiring vision—a vision in which eternity and motion coexist, forming a harmonious unity. In this synthesis, the full power of Divine presence is revealed, one that enlivens and inspires our world not only with its unchanging essence but also with a continuous life force.

How can we interpret the notion of God: what does His description in terms of a noun or a verb mean?

The concept of God can be interpreted from two sides: as something fixed and static—a noun—and as something active, continuous, and dynamic—a verb. In the nominal interpretation, God is perceived as the absolute, self-existent being, expressed in the idea "God is God," where eternality and self-sufficiency are His main characteristics. This viewpoint emphasizes the immutability and incomprehensibility of the Divine, placing Him beyond any of our conceptualizations.

On the other hand, describing God in terms of a verb shifts the focus to the act of being, to the dynamic manifestation of His essence. One source explains:
"In the Slavic language, this word may derive from two roots. Either from the ancient Sanskrit word bhaga, meaning 'rich'... or one can derive the word 'God' as Khomyakov does from the verb 'to be': God—the One Who is, the One Who is not created (one could add: not invented), but exists independently, in a real, immutable, yet living and trembling state of being." (source: link )

This interpretation underscores that God is not a static entity but one whose essence manifests itself through being. This understanding resonates with the idea that dynamism and action are identified with Divine presence. Additionally, another source develops the thought connecting the static description with active force, stating:
"The Son is the Word of God, and the Spirit—the verb of the Son. For it is said: 'bearing every kind of power with his word'... And the Word of God is a living and effective verb." (source: link )

Here, a synthesis is evident: the noun (the Word of God) provides the image and content, while the verb (action, movement) represents the principle of creative activity and the constant presence of God in the world.

Thus, describing God as a noun emphasizes His absoluteness, immutability, and eternal nature, while describing Him in terms of a verb reveals His ongoing action, creative energy, and dynamic manifestation. These two approaches do not exclude one another but rather complement a broader understanding of the Divine as both an immutable being and a continuous process of creation and action.