Evolving Role Dynamics in Modern Relationships

In modern society, lively discussions can be observed surrounding questions of the traditional division of roles between men and women. Many claim that even if a woman is able to work in a male-dominated profession or wear men’s clothing, her inner world remains steadfastly feminine, which, according to some authors, predetermines a specific functional specialization for each gender. This view leads to the idea that a woman’s attempt to enter the “male” sphere can disrupt the natural order, causing family friction and creating tension in relationships.

The core of this issue lies in the historically established understanding of role distribution, which often assumes that each gender possesses innate characteristics defining its behavior and emotional structure. At the same time, a paradox is observed: women, while taking on duties traditionally assigned to men, are forced to balance a career, childcare, and household management, often resulting in overload. Meanwhile, men, confronted with the diminishing of their traditional role in the family, experience internal conflicts and a sense of lost leadership, further exacerbating family disputes.

In summary, the drive for equality in both public and family life encounters deeply ingrained beliefs about the natural predisposition of each gender. In the quest to balance traditional values with modern realities, there is a need to reassess these views. Only through a careful reflection on historical aspects and contemporary demands can a new, more harmonious understanding of roles be achieved—one where everyone is able to realize their potential without compromising personal happiness and family well-being.

Why, in some relationships, does the expectation still persist that women should perform functions traditionally associated with men, and how does this affect couples?
The answer is based on several perspectives found in various sources, which argue that the expectation for women to perform functions traditionally associated with men is dictated by deeply ingrained beliefs about the inherent differences between the sexes. It is believed that, even though a woman can perform “male work” and dress in men’s clothing, her spiritual and psychological nature remains inherently feminine, which, in the author’s view, defines the specific role of each gender. Thus, a woman’s attempt to take on functions that do not align with her natural disposition is perceived as a distortion of traditional roles, leading to family conflicts and tension in relationships.

For example, one source states:
"Each gender has its own functions, inherent only to it. And the Lord arranged it so that not only the physical nature, but also the psyche and soul of each gender, were suited to and served its purpose. A woman may wear men’s clothing, perform male work (perhaps even well), but she can never think like a man or feel like a man—a woman's soul cannot become male. Yes, women have always been dependent on men. This has been so in all times, among all peoples. The theory that a matriarchy ever existed in any society is nothing more than a historical fable. There is no serious evidence for it."
(Source: link )

Another perspective is revealed in the description of the social effects of this dilemma: the increased burden on women, who are forced to combine work, childcare, and household chores, while the changing roles lead to a loss of traditional masculinity among men. As a result, the dynamics within the couple change—men begin to feel as though they have lost their “place” in the family, and women find themselves in a role for which, as the author argues, they lack innate predisposition. As another source writes:
"In our society, women have come to work two jobs, while also managing shopping, raising children, and even looking after their husbands—essentially becoming like men, very strong men. And men have turned into a mess, unable either to provide for the family, to quit smoking, or to give up a shot of vodka..."
(Source: link )

Thus, the expectation that a woman should perform functions traditionally associated with men stems from the historically rooted division of roles, where each side is perceived through the lens of its natural destiny. The violation of this order leads to imbalances and disagreements within couples: the male role is devalued, while the woman bears an excessive burden, undermining mutual understanding and leading to conflicts.

Supporting citation(s):
"Each gender has its own functions, inherent only to it. And the Lord arranged it so that not only the physical nature, but also the psyche and soul of each gender, were suited to and served its purpose. A woman may wear men’s clothing, perform male work (perhaps even well), but she can never think like a man or feel like a man..."
(Source: link )

"In our society, women have come to work two jobs, while also managing shopping, raising children, and even looking after their husbands—essentially becoming like men... And men have turned into a mess..."
(Source: link )