Embracing Complexity: Moving Beyond Binary Judgments

Rejecting the division of everything into "good" and "bad" opens up new perspectives for perceiving reality—a harmonious, multi-layered, and deeply human approach. Adopting such a method allows us to see each situation and every person in their full complexity, bypassing stereotypical and prejudiced thinking. This is not merely a change in mentality, but a significant step towards reducing social tension and strengthening genuine understanding among people.

The main point is that established binary evaluation systems often lead to unjust generalizations, division among peoples, and even distortions of historical reality. When, instead of strict labels, we strive for a comprehensive analysis of events, rigid dogmas and superficial moral judgments disappear. This approach does not so much deny the concepts of good and evil as it rethinks them, allowing historical and social processes to be viewed in their wholeness and diversity.

In conclusion, abandoning a black-and-white view of the world not only enriches our understanding of reality but also becomes an important tool on the path to humanizing relations among people and nations. It is a dynamic and inspiring process that enables each of us to contribute to creating a society based on mutual respect and a deep comprehension of complex historical and social processes.

What changes might occur in one's worldview if we cease to divide phenomena into good and bad?
Rejecting this division can lead to a fundamental change in perspective—from a binary, often stereotypical perception of the world to a more complex, multifaceted, and less judgmental picture of reality. This shift allows us to see phenomena and people in their entirety without imposing harsh labels, which in turn reduces bias and fosters better understanding among individuals.

For example, in a text dedicated to overcoming Nazism, the author poses the question:
"How is it possible, after all the 'overcomings' of Nazism, to continue dividing nations into 'good' and 'bad', and to find only the former worthy of compassion? If this is not racism, then what is racism? How is it possible to see culpability not in those who committed it, but in the entire 'Polish society'? Is this not how the supporters of Hitler reasoned?... What are the obstacles today to the moral overcoming of a totalitarian past and the fragmentation among peoples?"
(Source: link )

Here, the author emphasizes that such a dichotomy engenders unjust generalizations, divides nations, and impedes genuine moral development. Eliminating the artificial division of good and bad can foster a departure from biased evaluations and enhance the pursuit of a deeper understanding of human nature and historical processes.

Moreover, in one discussion about the concepts of good and evil, it is stated:
"From this it follows that we are forced to believe in the true existence of good and evil. At times, people may be mistaken in defining them, just as they make errors when adding numbers, but the concept of good and evil... I am not preaching here, and God knows I am not trying to appear better than others."
(Source: link )

This quote illustrates that the belief in absolute good and evil becomes a sort of necessity for conventional thinking. Rejecting such divisions could lead people to stop viewing the world through the lens of rigid oppositions, potentially unleashing an inner freedom from constant evaluative judgments and conflicting stances.

Thus, rejecting the division of phenomena into good and bad can contribute to the development of a more flexible, integrated, and humane worldview, one that opens up opportunities for deep understanding and acceptance of the diversity of reality without constantly imposing labels.