Mysticism, Trolling, and Theatrical Rituals

In modern public discourse, heated debates often arise around traditional mystical practices, especially when figures such as Mizulina and the Shaman are involved. From the outset, it is clear that the basis for criticism is a deep skepticism towards the formalism of ritual actions, where the success of a magical ritual is determined not by personal qualities or emotional connection but by the exact repetition of ancient traditions. This approach has led to the view that the demonstration of supernatural abilities is merely theatrical, making these performances an easy target for ridicule and criticism.

At the same time, it must be noted that contradictions within traditional communities also contribute to the emergence of trolling. In a historical context, many practitioners of mystical arts spent their entire lives adhering to strict ritual traditions, which in turn generated internal disagreements and opposition. In the modern world, these contradictions are reflected in critical online discussions, where trolls use such arguments to question the subjectivity and legitimacy of the claimed supernatural abilities.

Finally, the performative aspect of mystical activities—comparing them to theatrical performances—only reinforces the skeptical attitude. This interpretation shows that behind the external display of power may lie nothing more than a well-rehearsed script devoid of genuine spiritual content. This argument is often used to undermine the seriousness of the practice, portraying it as routine and nominal.

Thus, the combination of traditional formalism, internal conflicts, and the theatrical nature of the performances creates fertile ground for criticism from trolls intent on mocking mystical practices. Such criticism not only reflects the skepticism of the modern audience but also emphasizes the importance of continuously reevaluating ancient traditions in light of contemporary realities.

What motivations and circumstances might contribute to trolling directed at Mizulina and the Shaman?

Answer:

The motivations for trolling figures like Mizulina and the Shaman may be rooted in several factors associated with traditional perceptions of mystical practices and public conflicts surrounding authority ideals. Firstly, there is deep skepticism regarding claims of supernatural power, especially when it is demonstrated that “magical techniques work on their own,” and the success of a ritual depends not on mutual affection or personal qualities but solely on the reproduction of traditional formulas and actions (“As is characteristic of the world of magic and witchcraft, neither the disposition of the heart nor mutual love is important for successful ‘contacting,’ but only the correct repetition of spells and rituals...” – source: link ). This approach allows critics and trolls to argue that the emphasis on ritual elements is superficial and formal, which can generate ridicule and distrust.

Secondly, circumstances in which the values of traditional mystical experience become the subject of internal opposition also contribute to trolling. In ancient communities, as noted, “some of them spent most of their lives dedicating themselves solely to ritual mysteries and spells, which sometimes became the cause of internal opposition within the community” (source: link ). Transposed into the modern arena, this conflict gives trolls the opportunity to use similar distrust in purely formal displays of spirituality to mock or diminish the significance of the claimed insights.

Finally, the performative aspect—when shamanic practice is compared to “a theatrical performance”—provides trolls ample material for ridicule, as this comparison highlights the organized and nominal character of the rituals (source: link ). When mystical activity is seen as a staged performance, its participants become easy targets for criticism for allegedly insincere demonstrations of power or authority.

Thus, the motivations for trolling figures like Mizulina and the Shaman can be based on skepticism regarding the formal nature of rituals, internal opposition within traditional communities, and the performative, theatrical character of claims to supernatural abilities. These circumstances enable trolls to leverage cultural and social contradictions as an argument for their criticism and mockery.

Supporting citation(s):
"As is characteristic of the world of magic and witchcraft, neither the disposition of the heart nor mutual love is important for successful 'contacting,' but rather the correct repetition of spells and rituals. There is no question of whether the shaman loves the spirit or whether the spirit loves the shaman. Indeed, magical techniques work on their own. That world of spirits, with which shamans (both old and new – 'psychics') communicate, is ready to respond to any call, to any sign of attention – as long as the person makes contact." (source: link )

"These were the motives and circumstances under which ancient shamans made decisions, holding the life of the tribe and its well-being in their hands. Some of them spent most of their lives dedicating themselves solely to ritual mysteries and spells, which sometimes became the cause of internal opposition within the community." (source: link )

"Shamanic practice is similar to a theatrical performance. The shaman plays all roles in sequence, but primarily assumes the role of organizer and trainer of benevolent forces that eventually dispel destructive ones. The final expulsion is often expressed in a material symbol." (source: link )