In the modern world, many views on dog behavior and their natural manifestations are sometimes tinted negatively, and this is not a coincidence.

Nature vs. Modern Standards

In the modern world, many views on dog behavior and their natural manifestations are sometimes tinted negatively, and this is not a coincidence. At the root of such attitudes lie everyday observations: dogs, unlike their furry counterparts, often leave behind a characteristic odor, especially during a female’s heat, and they do not resort to the meticulous hygiene that cats practice. Their tendency to casually wallow in dirt or even ingest their own excretions becomes an argument for those who perceive their behavior as a lack of cleanliness and order.

In today’s society, where traditional roles of animals have been blurred, the habits of dogs become even more noticeable. Historically, animals had clearly defined functions – the dog guarded the house from the outside, while the cat provided comfort indoors. However, the natural signals and behaviors of dogs can now trigger repulsion in some people, leading to aggressive or intrusive reactions toward them.

This perception underscores a conflict between the natural instincts of animals and modern ideas of hygiene and cleanliness. In reflecting on this, it is important to remember that the inherent characteristics of dogs are part of their essence, and the negativity prompted by their behavior speaks less about the animal itself and more about human prejudices and the changing urban culture. Ultimately, to find a balance between the natural instincts of animals and modern norms, it is worthwhile to view these traits from the perspective of natural authenticity and the multifaceted nature of life.

What possible motives prompt some people to bother other people’s dogs?

The answer can be formulated as follows. Some individuals who bother other people’s dogs may be driven primarily by everyday beliefs and a negative assessment of natural animal habits. For example, an excerpt from source link txt states that “the mystical reasons for the negative attitude of some pagans toward dogs are unclear, but the everyday reasons are quite understandable.” The author explains that dogs emit a “doggy” odor, which is especially noticeable during the heat of females when they do not groom themselves as cats do, and describes how dogs calmly lie in the dirt or even consume their own vomit. These everyday characteristics can trigger repulsion and negativity, which in turn may lead some people to behave aggressively or intrusively toward other people’s dogs.

Thus, it can be said that the motives behind such behavior stem from dissatisfaction with the natural, even if innate, signals and habits of dogs, which are perceived as shortcomings in cleanliness and tidiness – especially in the context of modern life, where traditional distinctions (such as the distribution of animal roles in a household) have lost their relevance.

Supporting citation(s):
“Mystical reasons for the negative attitude of some pagans toward dogs are unclear, but the everyday reasons are quite understandable. Dogs emit a 'doggy' scent. Unlike cats, bitches during heat do not groom themselves and leave traces. Dogs calmly lie in dirt and consume their own vomit. Dogs can go insane (and then devour their puppies). But in the end, all of this is not inevitable. Yes, in traditional households, the roles of animals were rationally and clearly distributed: the dog guards the house from the outside, the cat from the inside. But our apartments do not have 'yard plots.' So the dog has to be let in.” (source: link txt)