Nietzsche challenges established norms by arguing that the radical negation of God is the first fatal error, even preceding what he calls the “second error” concerning the female essence.

Renouncing the Divine: Nietzsche’s Fatal Errors

Nietzsche challenges established norms by arguing that the radical negation of God is the first fatal error, even preceding what he calls the “second error” concerning the female essence. In his worldview, the dogmatic critique of God becomes the initial act that undermines the very notion of God, opening up a void into which new, often irrational idols eventually enter. This stance not only questions traditional moral and religious foundations but also prompts reflection on an existential crisis of human nature, where the rejection of absolute values leads to the search for new, sometimes dangerous alternatives. Nietzsche demonstrates that a seemingly rational break with faith can turn into a profound existential crisis, necessitating a rethinking of the fundamental concepts of life and morality, which makes his philosophy genuinely relevant and compelling for modern thought.

If, according to Nietzsche, woman is considered the second error of God, what, according to his views, is the first, and what does this say about his philosophy?

According to Nietzsche, if woman is regarded as the second error of God, then the first error is the negation of God—that is, the “killing” of God through dogmatic criticism. As noted in one source, “Nietzsche falls into the very same error—of dogmatic negation of God. ‘We have killed God,’ he says” (source: link txt). Here, Nietzsche points out that before using reason to “kill God” (that is, to reject God as an absolute), a fundamental mistake concerning the very notion of God had already been made.

This position indicates that Nietzsche’s philosophy is deeply rooted in the critique of traditional, established values and worldviews. His protest against Christianity and its collective complacency is based on the idea that the renunciation of God is accompanied by a state of emptiness that man cannot accept, forcing him to seek a replacement in the form of new, often irrational wonders and idols. Thus, the juxtaposition of the first and second errors of God reflects his belief that the abandonment of God leads to a profound crisis in the understanding of human nature and the moral order.