Suppressing Dissent: Tactics of Ideological Control
Analyzing the provided materials, one can assume that blocking questions on such topics may be related to the deliberate restriction of access to alternative ideas and viewpoints that challenge the established ideology or dominant narrative. In particular, methods aimed at suppressing critical thinking and independent analysis, as well as imposing strict control over the informational environment, are used. This is carried out through techniques that hinder the acceptance of ideas that do not conform to the prescribed paradigm.Thus, in one of the quoted fragments, it is stated:"Mind blocking: achieved by applying the aforementioned methods that prevent a person from accepting ideas alien to the sect's ideology. Control of the environment: total informant culture—if you concealed a comrade’s sin, then you took his sin upon yourself." (source: link txt)This approach indicates that any questions which may challenge or dispute the dominant point of view can be perceived as a threat and, accordingly, be blocked. Moreover, additional thought-control methods mentioned in the materials imply the imposition of new concepts and a change in the established order, which may also contribute to restricting access to alternative topics.Thus, if questions related to the topics "pessi" and "analdu" are perceived as containing ideas that contradict the established ideology or undermine the control over consciousness, they may face blocking. This is done in order to protect the dominant narrative, in which critical thinking is deliberately suppressed.Supporting citation(s):"Mind blocking: achieved by applying the aforementioned methods that prevent a person from accepting ideas alien to the sect's ideology. Control of the environment: total informant culture—if you concealed a comrade’s sin, then you took his sin upon yourself." (source: link txt)